| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 02.06.00 22:11l 239 Lines 7510 Bytes #-9459 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_154A
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/154A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0SAA<DB0TTM<DB0FP<DB0SHL<DB0ERF<DB0SHG<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<
PI8GCB<PI8HGL
Sent: 000602/1728Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:46796 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_154A
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 00 18:51:06 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_154A>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Fri, 2 Jun 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 154
Today's Topics:
AEA PK-900 Firmware? (2 msgs)
DSP settings for PSK31
Help -- 128 KB SRAM Chip (4 msgs)
List of the rec.radio newsgroups
Looking for Nico Palermo - YAM modem creator
N0ZO no longer supports Keyboard inputs! (5 msgs)
Using Digipan 1.1 to Key Kenwood Radio
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/154
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 21:00:18 -0400
From: "Marg" <PseNoEmail@No.com>
Subject: AEA PK-900 Firmware?
Does anyone know whether Timewave sells just the latest firmware upgrade for
the PK-900 (without having to buy the DSP upgrade)??
Marg
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:55:57 GMT
From: jdouglas@timewave.com (John Douglas)
Subject: AEA PK-900 Firmware?
In article <SGDZ4.4778$qS3.12579@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>, "Marg"
<PseNoEmail@No.com> wrote:
>Does anyone know whether Timewave sells just the latest firmware upgrade for
>the PK-900 (without having to buy the DSP upgrade)??
>
>Marg
>
>
Hello Marg,
Upgrades for the PK-900 are available in the DSP upgrade only.
73 John N0ISL
Timewave Technology
Watch for the NEW sound of CW.. Coming Soon...
------------------------------
Date: 01 Jun 2000 18:36:57 GMT
From: julswn@aol.com (JulSwn)
Subject: DSP settings for PSK31
All looks good to me. You do not really need a dsp though. With winpsk or
digiapna you need the wide bandwidth and so there is no need for anything
else.
It is the goood and bad of those programs. You have the convienience of eas of
use but if there is a LOT of qrm, you do not hvae the narrow filters to help.
In most case and most radios, they don;t't help in any cae.
The best thign to do in that case is to tune in the staion and tiurn off the
AFC to prvent catpure effect.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:07:00 -0400
From: "Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com>
Subject: Help -- 128 KB SRAM Chip
Hi,
I would like to upgrade the static RAM (SRAM) chip in my KPC-3.
I need a SRAM chip (part number S628128-70L).
They are sold out in this area. There are on back order -- probably at
least 4 weeks before they show up. KANTRONICS sells them but they are way
TOO expensive. Talk about a mark-up!
I can buy a 128 KB SRAM low-low power chip (part number S628128-70LL such as
Hitachi HY628100A LLP-70). It is even less expensive.
Does anyone know what the difference is between the S628128-70L chip and the
S628128-70LL chip??
Can I use the S628128-70LL in the KPC-3??
73's
Rob
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:11:50 GMT
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: Help -- 128 KB SRAM Chip
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Rob wrote:
> I would like to upgrade the static RAM (SRAM) chip in my KPC-3.
>
> I need a SRAM chip (part number S628128-70L).
> They are sold out in this area. There are on back order -- probably at
> least 4 weeks before they show up. KANTRONICS sells them but they are way
> TOO expensive. Talk about a mark-up!
>
> I can buy a 128 KB SRAM low-low power chip (part number S628128-70LL such as
> Hitachi HY628100A LLP-70). It is even less expensive.
>
> Does anyone know what the difference is between the S628128-70L chip and the
> S628128-70LL chip??
>
> Can I use the S628128-70LL in the KPC-3??
Did you try Hitachi's web site? I bet the only difference is power
consumption
(as in current drain).
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 20:54:08 -0400
From: "Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com>
Subject: Help -- 128 KB SRAM Chip
There is no information on this chip on the Hitachi web site. Very strange.
I sent Hitachi an Email. But perhaps someone reading this post may have had
some actual experience with this type of chip.
73's
Rob
"D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.10.10006020011000.138-100000@mbx.bde-arc.ampr.org...
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Rob wrote:
> > I would like to upgrade the static RAM (SRAM) chip in my KPC-3.
> >
> > I need a SRAM chip (part number S628128-70L).
> > They are sold out in this area. There are on back order -- probably at
> > least 4 weeks before they show up. KANTRONICS sells them but they are
way
> > TOO expensive. Talk about a mark-up!
> >
> > I can buy a 128 KB SRAM low-low power chip (part number S628128-70LL
such as
> > Hitachi HY628100A LLP-70). It is even less expensive.
> >
> > Does anyone know what the difference is between the S628128-70L chip and
the
> > S628128-70LL chip??
> >
> > Can I use the S628128-70LL in the KPC-3??
>
> Did you try Hitachi's web site? I bet the only difference is power
consumption
> (as in current drain).
>
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 23:00:23 -0700
From: "Dana H. Myers K6JQ" <Dana@Source.Net>
Subject: Help -- 128 KB SRAM Chip
"D. Stussy" wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Rob wrote:
>
> > I can buy a 128 KB SRAM low-low power chip (part number S628128-70LL such
as
> > Hitachi HY628100A LLP-70). It is even less expensive.
> >
> > Does anyone know what the difference is between the S628128-70L chip and
the
> > S628128-70LL chip??
> >
> > Can I use the S628128-70LL in the KPC-3??
>
> Did you try Hitachi's web site? I bet the only difference is power
consumption
> (as in current drain).
I'd be a little cautious, since there are more and more 3.3V chips out these
days
that might not tolerate 5V.
--
Dana K6JQ DoD #j
dana@source.net
------------------------------
Date: 2 Jun 2000 05:08:04 GMT
From: jeffreyh@Hawaii.Edu (Jeffrey Herman)
Subject: List of the rec.radio newsgroups
Archive-name: radio/personal-brief-introduction
In an effort help ensure a poster's article reaches the appropriate
audience, below is a list of the rec.radio newsgroups. In most cases,
a group's name will explain its purpose. Cross-posting should rarely
be necessary.
rec.radio.broadcasting (devoted to the broadcast industry; moderated)
rec.radio.cb
rec.radio.info (periodic informational bulletins; moderated)
rec.radio.scanner
rec.radio.shortwave
rec.radio.swap (for buying, selling, and trading; not a discussion group)
rec.radio.amateur.antenna
rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors (tube-type communications equipment)
rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc (packet, pactor and other digital modes)
rec.radio.amateur.dx (long-distance amateur communications)
rec.radio.amateur.equipment (questions, comments regarding commercially-
built amateur gear; not for buying/selling)
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew (devoted to home-building ham gear)
rec.radio.amateur.policy (issues include code, restructuring, local
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_154B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
