| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 08.04.00 08:01l 221 Lines 7196 Bytes #-9517 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_95A
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/95A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0BRI<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8HGL<PI8VNW
Sent: 000405/2027Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:60107 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA32153 ; Wed, 05 Apr 00 20:23:14 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00000218 ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 21:56:28 MET
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 00 21:55:53 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_95A>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/95A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Tue, 4 Apr 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 95
Today's Topics:
Digital Amateur Radio License (2 msgs)
ICOM 735 LITHIUM BATTERY (2 msgs)
RTTY Logger/Control for Pegasus (2 msgs)
test
Will a GPS provide continuous, accurate altitude measurements? (6 msgs)
XTAL BP-filter ?? (4 msgs)
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/95
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 06:43:19 -0700
From: "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
I seem to recall that you pridefully coined a number of derogatory
terms for no-code hams. My point stands.
--
Roger J. Buffington
W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
____________________
Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
"Politicians are the same the world over...
They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
-- Nikita Khruschev
"Bob Wex w2ilp" <w2ilp@juno.com> wrote in message
news:8c82aq$laj$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <38e4b7f7_4@news1.prserv.net>,
> "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
> > It is a sig file, you cretin.
>
> Why do you call a fellow Ham a cretin?
> On your web site it says that you are a "nice guy". You look like
you
> might be a nice guy. I had even apologized for posting on what you
> call a "sig file". What more do you expect? Anyway this is IMHO
> miscelaneous.
> > --
> >
> > Roger J. Buffington
> > W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
> > ____________________
> >
> > Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
> > Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
> I visited TNX for good sites.
> > "Politicians are the same the world over...
> > They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
> > -- Nikita Khruschev
> Most politicians start by being lawyers.
> Engineers build bridges. Politicians decide where to place them.
> Lawyers may let them be built where there are no rivers if a pissing
> contest promises to make a future river out of a stream.
>
> Hams need MORE license classes and guidance from engineers who are
not
> lawyers.
> Bob Wex w2ilp (Illegal Lawyer's Proposals?)
>
> > "Bob Wex w2ilp" <w2ilp@juno.com> wrote in message
> > news:8c0a60$hj4$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > > In article <38e36e3b_2@news1.prserv.net>,
> > > "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
> > > > Can't we keep this license class crap off of digital -- policy
is
> > the
> > > > place for it.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Roger J. Buffington
> > > > W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
> > > > ____________________
> > > >
> > > > Visit my QRZ page:
http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
> > > > Visit my photo page:
http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
> > > >
> > > > "Politicians are the same the world over...
> > > > They promise to build bridges, even where there are no
rivers."
> > > > -- Nikita Khruschev
> > > Digital bridges???
> > > What has an often repeated quote by Kruschev got to do
> > > with "digital.misc."? It isn't even amateur policy.
> > > It is the opinion of a former professional politician.
> > >
> > > > "Bob Wex w2ilp" <w2ilp@juno.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:8buba0$boi$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > > > > In article <sdb93hsslul64@corp.supernews.com>,
> > > > > "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote:
> > > > > > "Bob Wex w2ilp" wrote
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hams need more license classes to maintain their basis
and
> > > > purpose
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > being state of the art communicators and capable of
forming
> > a
> > > > cadre
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > experts!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK, how about:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lower class
> > > > > > Middle Class
> > > > > > Upper Class
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do we use to distinguish each class?
> > > > >
> > > > > Common sense...and appropriate qualifying exams...
> > > > > Three classes can't do it!
> > > > > Please read my post titled "Partitions for Reconsideration
of
> > New
> > > > Ham
> > > > > Rules". I am not alone in thinking that the basis and
purpose of
> > > > Ham
> > > > > Radio says that it is a TECHNICAL HOBBY. I don't expect all
hams
> > to
> > > > be
> > > > > technical experts BUT I would like to think that some Hams
may
> > be
> > > > more
> > > > > qualified in that direction than others. For Ham Radio to
get
> > > > respect
> > > > > (not just an ego boost for individual's self esteem) we need
> > more
> > > > Hams
> > > > > to be technically qualified at the higher levels of modern
> > > > > communication technology.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hams need MORE license classes,
> > > > > Bob Wex w2ilp (Initiating License Philosophy)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > Sorry guys...Further posts relating to this thread might better
> > belong
> > > on rec.radio.amateur.policy.
> > > Bob Wex,w2ilp (I'll Label Posts)
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > Honesty is the best policy.
> > > --Dick Tracy--
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 06:49:55 -0700
From: "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
I had to read this post by Wexelbaum twice before I could believe my
eyes. I guess some people just have a taste for Big Government.
Well, Wexie, other than pay my taxes, I haven't done jack squat for my
Government lately, and that is the way I like it. The people don't
exist to benefit the Government, the opposite is the case. The
Government did not invent amateur radio, amateur radio operators
invented radio. For some reason, for literally years, you have been
posting essentially the same post, day after day, advocating a
multitude of license classes, together with the notion that all hams
should essentially consider themselves to be servants of the
Government. Nonsense, of course. It is plain that no one is
listening. Could you at least confine such posts to policy, which is
where they belong? This is the digital usenet group.
--
Roger J. Buffington
W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
____________________
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_95B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
