| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 08.04.00 07:51l 224 Lines 6873 Bytes #-9520 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_94B
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/94B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0BOX<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0ME<DB0QS<
DB0ACC<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8GCB<PI8HGL<PI8VNW
Sent: 000404/0326Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:60095 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA32144 ; Tue, 04 Apr 00 03:14:45 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00000185 ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 18:18:50 MET
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 00 18:08:19 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_94B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/94B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
PK-232 back in 92.
--
Roger J. Buffington
W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
____________________
Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
"Politicians are the same the world over...
They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
-- Nikita Khruschev
"W6RCecilA" <Cecil.A.Moore@IEEE.org> wrote in message
news:38E10081.F36A5BBF@IEEE.org...
> svcfish@yahoo.com wrote:
> > How about one of the newer Icoms or Yaesus ?
>
> The IC-706 works like a charm with the SCS PTC2e. One quirk -
> I installed a 500Hz (FL-100) filter and told the IC-706 that
> it was an FL-223 (SSB) filter so it would switch the narrow
> filter in for PACTOR operation using SSB mode AFSK. I got
> my IC-706MKII from AES as a closeout at $998.
> --
> 73, Cecil, W6RCA http://www.mindspring.com/~w6rca
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 13:30:06 GMT
From: "mark" <sunc79@gte.net>
Subject: CDR VS MD. Opinion
I am an audiophile.
I have owned several MD recorders. I am in the market to replace my MD with
a higher end unit. Before I do, I must consider a CDR. I love to MD format &
am satisfied with the recording. It sounds close to a cd but not exact.
What I would like to find out is what do people who own a CDR thing of the
CDR format & it;s sound quality. How reliable is the CDR, etc.
What do CDR blanks really cost, etc.
Thank you for your time.
Ray
sunc79@gte.net
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 09:16:46 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: CDR VS MD. Opinion
"mark" <sunc79@gte.net> wrote
> I am an audiophile.
Bzzzzt. Wrong group pecker-head. Get Mom to help.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 18:08:35 GMT
From: Bob Wex w2ilp <w2ilp@juno.com>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
In article <38e4b7f7_4@news1.prserv.net>,
"Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
> It is a sig file, you cretin.
Why do you call a fellow Ham a cretin?
On your web site it says that you are a "nice guy". You look like you
might be a nice guy. I had even apologized for posting on what you
call a "sig file". What more do you expect? Anyway this is IMHO
miscelaneous.
> --
>
> Roger J. Buffington
> W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
> ____________________
>
> Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
> Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
I visited TNX for good sites.
> "Politicians are the same the world over...
> They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
> -- Nikita Khruschev
Most politicians start by being lawyers.
Engineers build bridges. Politicians decide where to place them.
Lawyers may let them be built where there are no rivers if a pissing
contest promises to make a future river out of a stream.
Hams need MORE license classes and guidance from engineers who are not
lawyers.
Bob Wex w2ilp (Illegal Lawyer's Proposals?)
> "Bob Wex w2ilp" <w2ilp@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:8c0a60$hj4$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > In article <38e36e3b_2@news1.prserv.net>,
> > "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
> > > Can't we keep this license class crap off of digital -- policy is
> the
> > > place for it.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Roger J. Buffington
> > > W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
> > > ____________________
> > >
> > > Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
> > > Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
> > >
> > > "Politicians are the same the world over...
> > > They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
> > > -- Nikita Khruschev
> > Digital bridges???
> > What has an often repeated quote by Kruschev got to do
> > with "digital.misc."? It isn't even amateur policy.
> > It is the opinion of a former professional politician.
> >
> > > "Bob Wex w2ilp" <w2ilp@juno.com> wrote in message
> > > news:8buba0$boi$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > > > In article <sdb93hsslul64@corp.supernews.com>,
> > > > "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote:
> > > > > "Bob Wex w2ilp" wrote
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hams need more license classes to maintain their basis and
> > > purpose
> > > > of
> > > > > > being state of the art communicators and capable of forming
> a
> > > cadre
> > > > of
> > > > > > experts!
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, how about:
> > > > >
> > > > > Lower class
> > > > > Middle Class
> > > > > Upper Class
> > > > >
> > > > > What do we use to distinguish each class?
> > > >
> > > > Common sense...and appropriate qualifying exams...
> > > > Three classes can't do it!
> > > > Please read my post titled "Partitions for Reconsideration of
> New
> > > Ham
> > > > Rules". I am not alone in thinking that the basis and purpose of
> > > Ham
> > > > Radio says that it is a TECHNICAL HOBBY. I don't expect all hams
> to
> > > be
> > > > technical experts BUT I would like to think that some Hams may
> be
> > > more
> > > > qualified in that direction than others. For Ham Radio to get
> > > respect
> > > > (not just an ego boost for individual's self esteem) we need
> more
> > > Hams
> > > > to be technically qualified at the higher levels of modern
> > > > communication technology.
> > > >
> > > > Hams need MORE license classes,
> > > > Bob Wex w2ilp (Initiating License Philosophy)
> > > >
> > > >
> > Sorry guys...Further posts relating to this thread might better
> belong
> > on rec.radio.amateur.policy.
> > Bob Wex,w2ilp (I'll Label Posts)
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Honesty is the best policy.
> > --Dick Tracy--
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 19:02:57 GMT
From: Bob Wex w2ilp <w2ilp@juno.com>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
In article <#GZIeT9m$GA.60@cpmsnbbsa03>,
"lak" <lak@radio.land.com> wrote:
> After reading this post I question what benefits the government
supplies to
> amatuer radio? In fact, the regulatory situation arose from the fact
> commerical interests in the early 1900s saw a potential to make money
from
> radio spectrum and the government obilged them. So who really
benefits from
> regualtions commerical users who make money or people who spend money
to
> play?
All benefit by FCC regulations which prevent the spectrum from becoming
chaos. Many Hams learn as they "play".
> Using the logic set out in this post, the FCC should get out of the
amauter
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_94C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
