| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 08.04.00 07:45l 203 Lines 6703 Bytes #-9520 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_93A
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/93A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0ROF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<
PI8GCB<PI8HGL<PI8VNW
Sent: 000403/2050Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:60087 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA32138 ; Mon, 03 Apr 00 18:52:59 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00000167 ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 18:17:52 MET
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 00 18:08:03 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_93A>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/93A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Sun, 2 Apr 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 93
Today's Topics:
$99 Modern TNC (LCD 800x600) (2 msgs)
Baycom and Linux
Digipan
Digipan Com port configure problem
Digital Amateur Radio License (6 msgs)
Dolt needs suggestions on KamPlus v.8 software
DSP upgrades to PK232MBX
FA: ICOM UT-106 DSP module
fast PCB prototypes for $26!!!
FS: Astron Power Supply transformers
Ham radio links site
HAM RESOURCES SITE
HT re-booting the computer?
ic706 m2g
Miniprop Plus, Run time error 200
Need suggestions for PK-232 MBX on RTTY (5 msgs)
PR: The Golist and CSS negotiating to produce Windows 32 bit version of Golist
Rtty and PSK 31 interface Help needed (2 msgs)
RTTY Contests Software for SWL ?
Sound card programming (2 msgs)
Trade Hal PCI-4000
Want: Suggestions on packet terminal software
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/93
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 15:54:34 -0600
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: $99 Modern TNC (LCD 800x600)
Just a follow-up...
Good news:
The Netpliance i-Opener at Circuit City is $99 + tax. No other charges.
Bad news:
I'm number 12 on the local back-order list, and even San Francisco
doesn't have any for the last couple of weeks.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 10:01:24 GMT
From: nomail@rob.knoware.nl (Rob Janssen)
Subject: $99 Modern TNC (LCD 800x600)
Steve Sampson <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote:
>Just a follow-up...
>Good news:
>The Netpliance i-Opener at Circuit City is $99 + tax. No other charges.
>Bad news:
>I'm number 12 on the local back-order list, and even San Francisco
>doesn't have any for the last couple of weeks.
And Netpliance is now forcing you to get the service, so by the time
they are available at Circuit City you will most likely be asked to sign
a contract before you can have it.
Of course this could be expected, and it is their rightful thing to do. It
is a device that is sold below cost to use with a service that is supposed
to bring them the revenue. When everyone buys it without the service they
will soon be out of business.
Netpliance also stated that they will modify the newly produced units so
that the published modification is no longer possible. How they will do
that is unclear, but it seems most likely that the IDE interface will go.
Rob
--
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org | WWW: http://www.knoware.nl/users/rob |
| AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8WNO.#UTR.NLD.EU |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 19:57:46 -0500
From: Michael Callaham <callaham@erols.com>
Subject: Baycom and Linux
Yes. The archive
ftp://ftp.ucsd.edu/hamradio/packet/tcpip/nosview/nosvw304.zip
contains a version of KA9Q NOS for DOS along with a packet driver for BayCom,
which I have used since 1994.
The Tigertronics website has
http://www.tigertronics.com/files/jnos_bay.zip
but I haven't tried it.
73 de Mike, nw3v
--
Michael B. Callaham
mailto:callahamNOSPAM@alum.mit.edu
http://www.erols.com/callaham/
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:59:37 GMT
From: Den <dennis.spiess@reckitt.com>
Subject: Digipan
In article <8apg96$g8s$1@news.cy-net.net>,
dyess@txcyber.com (Dale Dyess) wrote:
> Does anyone know of another software program for running PSK31 that
compares
> with Digipan? Just curious. Dale , WA5GVE
>
I use WinPSK 1.1.. it is a neat package with some neat visual helps.
Also it runs very well on a 486/66! Give it a try.
--
Den Spiess W2DEN -.-
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: 25 Mar 2000 23:21:49 GMT
From: kenk@primenet.com (Ken Knecht)
Subject: Digipan Com port configure problem
I'm trying unsuccessfully to set the serial port in Digipan for
PSK31. My modem is Com 3. After opening up the CPU and tracing
cables from the mother board, the mouse seems to be on COM 2 and
Com 1 is an unused 25-pin connector. To try to verify the mouse
port number I looked at Mouse and the Device Manager in the
System properties in the control panel but neither tells which
port the mouse is connected to. W98 and Norton System Info don't
either.
Com 1 gives the "Error opening Com1" when I attempt to configure
the port. Ports 2 and 4 do the same. Port 3 doesn't, but I'm
sure that's the modem - at least according to Modem in the
Control Panel and the DUN setting.
The MB is an Asus VX97.
It doesn't matter if the PSK interface is plugged into the port
or not.
I am just setting up to try PSK31 for the first time, so this is
not something that was working earlier.
Any suggestions?
TIA
Ken W9NPP AZ
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:08:15 -0600
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
Here's my thinking on this. The FCC is a government office. They
use tax dollars to operate with. We also need Volunteer Examiners
to test all the classes, and charge a fee each time.
How can we have more classes and reduce government cost?
Why should all Americans subsidize Ham radio? What do they get?
"Bob Wex w2ilp" wrote
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_93B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
