| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 26.03.00 00:15l 257 Lines 6343 Bytes #-9535 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_84C
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/84C
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0AIS<DB0ME<DB0OVN<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8HWB<
PI8HGL<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000325/1922Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:59407 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA31903 ; Sat, 25 Mar 00 16:43:46 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018516 ; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 14:32:46 MET
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 00 14:20:57 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_84C>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/84C
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> via the computer port with a Win98
> computer? I have been told that the
> TNC can only talk to a DOS-based
> machine...
>
> Help!
>
> Any assistance would be really appreciated.
>
> Thanks for reading
>
> John
> occupant@enetis.net
> ..
>
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:39:04 -0600
From: Brian <burke1@icss.net>
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
W6RCecilA wrote:
> Jeffrey Herman wrote:
> > We're counting the QSOs; you can't work someone if you can't hear them.
>
> You are not counting the QSOs, Jeff. You are counting the QSOs *that you
> can hear*, a very subjective situation. The ratio of the number of CW QSOs
> that you can hear to the number of SSB QSOs that you can hear is not
> anywhere near the ratio of total CW QSOs to total SSB QSOs.
But the ARRL survey said that most Hams rearely or never use CW. Did they lie
to the ARRL or what?
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:50:05 -0600
From: Brian <burke1@icss.net>
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
Dave Heil wrote:
> Steve Sampson wrote:
> >
> > This is the basis of Christianity also...
> >
> > "W6RCecilA" wrote
> >
> > > You can't work someone if you can't hear them but it doesn't mean that
> > > they do not exist.
>
> Christianity is based upon the fact that you can't work 'em if you can't
> hear 'em? Must be one of those splinter sects. I'll have to start
> keeping an eye out for a spire topped by stacked monobanders.
>
> Dave 5H3US, K8MN
You've never worked the Vatican?
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:28:41 -0600
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
Jeffrey Herman <jeffreyh@Hawaii.Edu> wrote in message
news:8as3t3$ace$1@news.hawaii.edu...
>
> As communicators first and foremost,
Hams are not communicators first and foremost, Jeff.. They are Radio
operators first and foremost.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:25:58 GMT
From: kelly@dvol.com (Brian Kelly)
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:05:33 -0600, "Richard McCollum"
<rmccoll@radiks.net> wrote:
>
>There can be no dialog with a nincompoop -- there is no issue to
>discuss and he doesn't get it anyway. So he don't like CW -- big deal.
>
No, he doesn't just not like it, he hates it. Because he can't cut it
and we can. Tough shit.
>
>Dick McCollum N0BK
>
w3rv
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:17:20 -0600
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
Jeffrey Herman <jeffreyh@Hawaii.Edu> wrote in message
news:8as3t3$ace$1@news.hawaii.edu...
>
> As communicators first and foremost, do you believe it's a sound idea
> to have all the world's HF-amateurs proficient in a common mode? If so,
> which is currently more common -- Morse/CW or digital?
>
> Jeff KH6O
Although I do not have any strong opinion on the morse code issue, I do hate
to see the juvenile substitute for "logic" that Jeff uses here.
Phew! Stinky!
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:05:10 -0600
From: Brian <burke1@icss.net>
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
Paul Keinanen wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2000 02:05:23 GMT, jeffreyh@Hawaii.Edu (Jeffrey Herman)
> wrote:
>
> >As communicators first and foremost, do you believe it's a sound idea
> >to have all the world's HF-amateurs proficient in a common mode?
>
> What exactly would the purpose of such a common mode be ?
>
> There is already a common mode known as Carrier Detect Multiple Access
> (i.e. listen before transmit) to coordinate the use of the shared
> frequency resources :-).
>
> How do you expect anything more subtle than this frequency access
> protocol to be enforceable, when some rude operators ignore even this
> simple principle (usually with big linear amplifiers) ?
>
> Paul OH3LWR
Paul, sometimes its even opeators from America. Jefferey is still
seething over our upcoming restructuring where the Morse code exam will
play a smaller and slower role.
73, Brian/N0iMD
>.
------------------------------
Date: 23 Mar 2000 12:30:39 GMT
From: nr3nde@aol.com (NR3NDE)
Subject: MFJ-1278 and Pactor
I have a 1278 B and it does lock up in arq mode.I have changed the chips 2
times and it still locks up.It does work fine in fec mode.Just my two cents
worth.
73
DANE NR3N
>.
------------------------------
Date: 23 Mar 2000 10:33:31 -0600
From: george@agora.rdrop.com (George Rachor)
Subject: Need description of FSTV TR70A
I've run across a small box with the label FSTV "TR70A"
Can anyone tell me more about this device?
The front panel has a power switch and what appears to be a tuning dial.
The back has an antenna jack and what appears to be an output for a
television.
Anyone have more information?
Thanks,
George Rachor (KD7DCX) (Yup.. a beginner)
george@racsys.rt.rain.com
--
=========================================================
George L. Rachor Jr. george@racsys.rt.rain.com
Beaverton, Oregon http://racsys.rt.rain.com
United States of America Amateur Radio : KD7DCX
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:59:53 GMT
From: nomail@rob.knoware.nl (Rob Janssen)
Subject: NOS (and derivatives) don't send FRMRs ?
Dana H. Myers K6JQ <dana@source.net> wrote:
>I'm under the restriction that I'm building a packet server that needs to
>support what people bring, so alternative protocols really aren't an
>option (though I'm not worried about V1 AX.25).
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_84D
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
