| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 29.02.00 14:57l 249 Lines 7802 Bytes #-9563 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_59A
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/59A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<DB0ERF<DB0BRI<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8HGL<
PE1MVX<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000229/0729Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:55107 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA31115 ; Tue, 29 Feb 00 05:21:55 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018165 ; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:01:38 MET
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 00 06:53:47 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_59A>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/59A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Mon, 28 Feb 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 59
Today's Topics:
AX.25 with TCP/IP routing? (2 msgs)
Data rf frequency...which one?
Does this Kam98 even work? (2 msgs)
FM-UNIT R71
Internet over packet?
KNWD TR-8400 9600bd Mod???
Packet in Toronto (2 msgs)
Palm Vx & THD7A &???
remote HF radio control over packet
SITOR on KAM98... how?
Sound cards as modems
The Future of Packet (3 msgs)
Tower Space (9 msgs)
What is a good TNC?
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/59
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 26 Feb 2000 10:55:00 GMT
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@rising.com.au>
Subject: AX.25 with TCP/IP routing?
horseshoestew@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <QPCenGAFFit4EwyJ@care4free.net>,
> ianwade@netro.co.uk wrote:
>> Yes you certainly would, with DHCP. The DHCP server allocates you an
>> address and away you go. In everyday use for years.
> I've seen this option when setting up my PCs. Problem is you would have
> to have a server set up to do this. Never seen one of these animals
> ever in the real world.
Then what world are you working in? Most companies use DHCP I suspect
-- it makes administration a lot easier. If you have to change the
default gateway or name servers for your network, you just change
them once at the server -- no need to visit every PC. I even use DHCP
at home to set addresses for my Windows PCs.
73
Hamish vk3sb
--
Hamish Moffatt Mobile: +61 412 011 176 hamish@rising.com.au
Rising Software Australia Pty. Ltd. http://www.risingsoftware.com/
Phone: +61 3 9894 4788 Fax: +61 3 9894 3362 USA: 1 888 667 7839
>.
------------------------------
Date: 28 Feb 2000 06:02:20 GMT
From: ds0007@medtronic.COM (Dale M. Skiba)
Subject: AX.25 with TCP/IP routing?
Rob Janssen (nomail@rob.knoware.nl) wrote:
: Dale M. Skiba <ds0007@medtronic.COM> wrote:
: >I haven't read the details on AX.25, but I have a guess as
: >to what you are saying. Perhaps the root cause of the problem
: >is that X.25 includes both data link and routing stuff.
: First read the details... The AX.25 protocol has little or nothing to do
: with the X.25 protocol!
Is it worth it? (I mean not to waste effort required for something not
in widespread use.)
I'm just starting to play around with digital modes. It's very useful to
get info from you guys who know the protocols inside and out. What's the
next logical step after PSK31. Looks like it isn't AX.25 since it takes
some teamwork to extend it in a scalable way :-)
Dale Skiba
W0BOT
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 14:38:15 -0600
From: W6RCecilA <Cecil.A.Moore@IEEE.org>
Subject: Data rf frequency...which one?
Bob Lewis wrote:
> > but if you stick with PACTOR, it doesn't matter
> either. :-)
>
> Signal polarity doesn't matter in Pactor ARQ but
> it *does* matter for FEC mode which is what you
> use to call CQ.
Problem solved. I never call CQ. :-)
--
73, Cecil, W6RCA http://www.mindspring.com/~w6rca
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:45:27 -0600
From: "Dave Covert" <davecove@thecoverts.com>
Subject: Does this Kam98 even work?
Can someone with a KAM98 or KAM+ go to 8.42125 MHz LSB and see if they can
decode the SITOR (mode B FEC) there? It is from the US Coast Guard and is
supposed to be text weather information at certain times. The rest of the
time I am guessing the signal is repeated station ID info.
Thing is, although I see my tuning LEDs go rail to rail like I suppose they
should, I seldom see the Link/Con light come on and I never see anything
that lookslike intelligable data on the terminal program. I am using LAMTOR
to try to monitor the weather station xmission.
Any ideas how I might be (mis)using my KAM98? Help?
Dave KB5GOG
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:48:09 -0600
From: "Dave Covert" <davecove@thecoverts.com>
Subject: Does this Kam98 even work?
Thanks for the ideas...
I tuned in the USB and get pretty much the same thing...
In LAMTOR:
UR R R R R P DI R R R R K A YR R
N 4 4 4 4 6 KPE R R R R R U
R
R
In AMTOR:
<AMTOR STANDBY>
<FREESIG 0 BY UUUUUUUUUU>
<FREESIG 0 BY UUUUUUUUUU>
<FREESIG 0 BY UUUUUUUUUU>
<FREESIG 0 BY UUUUUUUUUU>
<FREESIG 0 BY UUUUUUUUUU>
<FREESIG 0 BY UUUUUUUUUU>
In FEC:
Nothing at all...
Dave
Rick Ruhl <ricker@cssincorp.com> wrote in message
news:8umu4.77111$ox5.20394092@tw11.nn.bcandid.com...
> Dave,
>
> Most Marine transmissions are done on USB. Change to USB and you can
decode.
> Also, you probably use use FEC rather than LAMTOR for monitoring these
> signals.
>
>
> "Dave Covert" <davecove@thecoverts.com> wrote in message
> news:22BF370AE2D20B27.F7F0A9B0F8BACAEC.391FD50081F50308@lp.airnews.net...
> > Can someone with a KAM98 or KAM+ go to 8.42125 MHz LSB and see if they
can
> > decode the SITOR (mode B FEC) there? It is from the US Coast Guard and
is
> > supposed to be text weather information at certain times. The rest of
the
> > time I am guessing the signal is repeated station ID info.
> >
> > Thing is, although I see my tuning LEDs go rail to rail like I suppose
> they
> > should, I seldom see the Link/Con light come on and I never see anything
> > that lookslike intelligable data on the terminal program. I am using
> LAMTOR
> > to try to monitor the weather station xmission.
> >
> > Any ideas how I might be (mis)using my KAM98? Help?
> >
> > Dave KB5GOG
> >
> >
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:31:08 +0100
From: "becro7" <becro7@zonnet.nl>
Subject: FM-UNIT R71
Want to bye a fm-unit for ICOM R71 RX
Offer to
becro7@zonnet.nl
>.
------------------------------
Date: 27 Feb 2000 15:14:16 GMT
From: "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@harvee.billerica.ma.us>
Subject: Internet over packet?
Gary Coffman <ke4zv@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Unsurprisingly, we're using them in Georgia. The occupied bandwidth
> is 70 kHz. We operate on 100 kHz channel spacings to provide some
> guard band. Note that the 219 MHz band allows only digital mode
> transmissions, and the bandplan is divided into 10 100 kHz channels.
> This is the perfect place to operate the WA4DSY RF modems
> (Down East Microwave has the appropriate transverter). The SERA
> (Southeast Repeater Association) bandplan for 440 MHz also provides
> 10 100 kHz channels for operation on that band. The latter doesn't help
> you in California, of course.
great idea but unfortunately its way too expensive for the benefit.
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_59B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
