| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 09.01.00 18:19l 309 Lines 8065 Bytes #-9621 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_7A
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/7A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<OE5XBL<OE6XAR<OE3XPR<OE3XBS<S50BOX<S50MBL<IV3AVQ<
IW3EFI<IW9EXL
Sent: 1000109/1600z @:IW9EXL.ISIC.ITA.EURO [Catania] UNICTeam #:67409 Z:95100
Message-Id: HD_2000_7A
From: sv1aaw@iw9exl.isic.ita.euro
To: hddig@eu
R:1000109/1600z @:SV1AAW.ATH.GRC.EURO [Athens] TNOS/U $:HD_2000_7A
R:000109/1345Z @:SV1AAW.ATH.GRC.EU #:34190 [Athens] FBB $:HD_2000_7A
R:000109/1335Z @:EA7URC.EACO.ESP.EU #:38784 [Cordoba] FBB $:HD_2000_7A
R:000109/1230Z @:PE0MAR.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:40949 [HvH]-LINUX- FBB
R:000109/1145Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:43191 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24 $:HD_2000_7A
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA28258 ; Sun, 09 Jan 00 09:45:30 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00017530 ; Sun, 09 Jan 2000 01:09:54 MET
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 00 01:05:11 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_7A>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/7A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Fri, 7 Jan 10 Volume 2000 : Issue 7
Today's Topics:
calling freq's for pactor II live qso's?? (3 msgs)
DOS-based PACTOR program?
FCC 5 WPM test requirement :-)
help getting started
Kenwood D700A arrived (3 msgs)
Packet
WinAPRS vs UI View?? (2 msgs)
Yaesu FT-990 Computer control
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/7
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 07:29:59 -0800
From: "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net>
Subject: calling freq's for pactor II live qso's??
I love the idea of Pactor 2 calling freqs. for human-to-human QSOs.
What about 14.074.25, 21.074.25, 14.079.5 and 21.079.5.
Just a suggestion...
--
Roger, W6VZV
also reply via W6VZV@ARRL.NET
--
Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build bridges, even where there are no rivers.
-Nikita Khrushchev
"Patricia Gibbons" <wa6ube@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:38748F47.4AB8@ix.netcom.com...
> Markus Lenggenhager wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately most of the Pactor II tfc you encounter on the bands
is
> > automatic S&F between BBSs.
> > What about the idea of establishing a calling frequency for Pactor
> > *live* QSOs per band? Of course it would have to be an "odd" QRG
(xxx.5
> > mark) to avoid being interrupted by S&F tfc suddenly starting and
not
> > caring about any weak-signal QSO going on.
> >
> > 73, Markus HB9BRJ
>
> Hey, I'm for having a calling frequency ..
>
> In fact, for amtor years ago, the standard calling frequencies
> were 7075, 14075, 21075, 28075 ... but I dunno, things may
> have changed a lot since the early 1980's ..
>
> As for 80 meters, was it 3645 KHz ??
>
> When on pactor/gtor I usually try calling cq's on the freq's
> listed above as they "used to be" the standard calling channel.
>
> Anyone know if this is still true??
>
> Trish
> --
>
> Patricia E. Gibbons
> Acting Chief Communications Technician
> City of San Jose - ITD/communications
> <http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=wa6ube>
> ......................................
> My Public Key is available at:
>
<http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xEDECB44F>
> Key ID: 0xEDECB44F
> This key is RSA, NOT Diffie-Hellman !!
>
> Echelon Magnet:
>
> Telex Military Intelligence
> Flame Infowar Bubba Freeh Archives
> jack Investigation ISACA NCSA spook
> words Verisign
>.
------------------------------
Date: 06 Jan 2000 13:11:51 -0800
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@netcom.com>
Subject: calling freq's for pactor II live qso's??
Are those frequencies mark, center, or indicated (LSB or USB, and high
or low tones)?
73, doug,
Who is awaiting his PTC-IIe anxiously.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 09:17:44 +0100
From: Markus Lenggenhager <Markus.Lenggenhager@philips.com>
Subject: calling freq's for pactor II live qso's??
In order to avoid live QSOs aborted by S&F tfc, I think we must stay on
the de-facto 0.5kHz grid. If not, we have potential QRM from both sides.
Over the weekend, I will query my updated BBS database to find out which
QRGs have a minimum of BBSs scanning them. Of course we also have to
avoid the ever-widening PSK31 segment.
Will publish my proposal here soon.
73, Markus HB9BRJ
Johnny Rico wrote:
>
> I love the idea of Pactor 2 calling freqs. for human-to-human QSOs.
> What about 14.074.25, 21.074.25, 14.079.5 and 21.079.5.
>
> Just a suggestion...
> --
>.
------------------------------
Date: 31 Dec 1999 13:16:44 GMT
From: ralphmw@aol.com (RalphMW)
Subject: DOS-based PACTOR program?
Jerry,
You're in luck. PC-PAKRATT is still around and is even new & improved for
Windows. Check out: http://www.timewave.com
They have bought AEA & supports their old gear and some software along with:
http://www.ccsincorp.com
Also check out:
http://www.packet-radio.demon.nl/indexen/pack6601.htm
I hope this helps.
73's de
Ralph NH6QT/3
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 13:41:27 -0700
From: Jim Cadien <jcadien@uswest.net>
Subject: FCC 5 WPM test requirement :-)
Dear yomama,
Why be so intolerant. Ham radio is a hobby, each of us has their own
specific interests. Many may not want to do anything digital. They
don't want to keep you from doing yours. All we want is to have fun
with amateur radio, in all its forms.
Jim Cadien
KC7ZMV
yomama wrote:
>
> Because SSB and CW are throwbacks to the stone-age. SAC in the 50's
> popularized
> the mode on HF. Hams in the 00's should bury it.
>
> I want digital everything. Analog is for the near-dead.
>
> Yoshi Yomama
> Particle Beam Weapons Lab
> Long Island Test Facility
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 08:06:15 -0800
From: "Bill Turner, W7TI" <wrt@eskimo.com>
Subject: help getting started
One common problem the first time out is having the mark/space inverted.
I don't have an MFJ, but if it's like most other TNCs, there should be a
command to invert them.
--
Bill, W7TI
> > I'm having trouble getting started on HF digital. I have an
MFJ-1278.
> > I have tried several software packages. I'm currently using XPCom
1.6
> > (trial version). I can send commands to the tnc to change modes,
etc.
> > and it responds properly (or, at least appears to -- it sends back
the
> > proper acknowledgements).
> >
> > However, when I tune in on a signal, I do not get anything
> > intelligible. How do I know what I am listening to without going
> > through all the possible modes/baud rates, etc.? Are there any
beacons,
> > standard broadcasts, etc. that I could use for setting up?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dale
> >
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 07:27:26 -0800
From: "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net>
Subject: Kenwood D700A arrived
Well, tell us about it!!!
--
Roger, W6VZV
also reply via W6VZV@ARRL.NET
--
Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build bridges, even where there are no rivers.
-Nikita Khrushchev
"Chris Arndt" <carndt@slonet.org> wrote in message
news:F92d4.3$%E3.334@news.callamer.com...
> Has anyone else received one and want to compare notes?
>
> (This is a mobile dual bander simalar in function to the D7A
handheld.
> It's on the back of QST.)
>
> 73,
>
> Chris KD6DSI
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 23:32:23 GMT
From: carndt@slonet.org (Chris Arndt)
Subject: Kenwood D700A arrived
In article <3874b7c5_3@news1.prserv.net>, Johnny Rico <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
>Well, tell us about it!!!
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_7B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
