| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 25.11.99 06:32l 291 Lines 7873 Bytes #-9672 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_99_300B
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 99/300B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PRG<OK0PAB<HA5OB<HA3PG<SV1AAW<
EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 991125/0114Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:24545 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:HD_99_30
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA24284 ; Wed, 24 Nov 99 23:45:11 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00016970 ; Wed, 24 Nov 99 20:31:25 MET
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 99 20:28:06 MET
Message-Id: <hd_99_300B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 99/300B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Unfortunately, the SCS PTC TNCS are expensive. (See www.scs-ptc.com)
I strongly recommend that you use PACTOR not Packet for your application!
73's
Rob
"Dale Gillilan" <positivechanges.hypnosis@gte.net> wrote in message
news:381E2BE3.BD854AC7@gte.net...
> I'm new to packet. Actually, I haven't started it yet. There seem to
> be so many options I don't know where to begin.
>
> Here is what I am wanting to do. I will be cruising on a sailboat and
> want to send/receive email. Access to an internet gateway would be nice
> so I could stay in contact with my non-ham family and friends. Of
> course, HF is a requirement.
>
> That's my need. Of course, I'm open to other fun possibilities....
>
> So, what equipment do I need? What speeds are appropriate and what
> modes?
>
> Any advice would be appreciated. And, answers get a bonus....
>
> Thanks,
> Dale
> WA7XH/M7
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: 22 Nov 1999 13:06:40 GMT
From: tdfjuy@trespass.net
Subject: internet technology resource 8911
http://home.att.net/~troy.lilly/otwrldelec.htm
Please post this in your news group.
Visit our Free Website dedicated to free internet education and electronics
and computer engineering. This free unique resource is maintained and
consistantly updated by a group of 4.0 electronics & Computer engineering
graduates and Certified electronic technicians as well as internet webmasters.
Enjoy your free education!!!
http://home.beseen.com/technology/twayne01/index.htm
qdjpfbknqibnfdhxdplzgyhvwepkvptwtcuosgllbxtojyvfbfoxpvzuq
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:22:27 -0500
From: "Rob" <NoEmail@NoWay.com>
Subject: JNOS vs TNOS??
There would appear to be many versions of NOS out there. The most popular
would appear to be JNOS and TNOS. (Both JNOS and TNOS have DOS versions
which might run under windows)
Which is the best version of NOS for DOS or Windows 98?? Is there any
consensus out there in the HAM world??
Is it JNOS or TNOS??
Rob
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 13:55:21 -0500
From: "Rob" <NoEmail@NoWay.com>
Subject: Software for SCS Pactor-II
Hi Cecil,
The PTCIIe does support PSK31. (I don't know why SCS does not advertise
that the PTC II and the PTCIIe support PSK31!)
I also use PTC II for SSTV using JVComm32. It works really well! (I am not
sure but I would think that the PTCIIe also supports SSTV). I have also
tried EZSSTV, JVFAX etc with the PTC II for SSTV and FAX. Thet work great
but they are DOS programs.
Logger is much more user friendly than G3PLX's program (with or without
PSKGNR enhancements).
I believe that the core of Logger uses the G3PLX algorithm so I doubt there
is much difference between the programs as far as performance is concerned.
73's
Rob
"W6RCecilA" <Cecil.A.Moore@IEEE.org> wrote in message
news:38398EB6.D65C4900@IEEE.org...
> Rob wrote:
> > It also will transmit and receive PSK31 using a soundcard. Logger has
split
> > screen, message buffers, type ahead buffer etc for PSK31. Logger is
much
> > better than G3PLX's program for PSK31 and a soundcard.
>
> More user friendly or functionally better? or both?
>
> > If you have a PTC II, you probably won't want to use the PSK31 feature
of
> > Logger since the PTC-II has PSK31 built into its firmware. By the way,
I
> > cannot see any difference in pertformance between the PTC II and Logger
in
> > its PSK31 mode!
>
> I'm getting a PTC2e. Not sure whether it handles PSK31 or not.
> --
> 73, Cecil, W6RCA http://www.mindspring.com/~w6rca
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 13:22:14 -0500
From: "Rob" <NoEmail@NoWay.com>
Subject: Software for SCS Pactor-II
Hi Cecil,
There are lots of places where you can find Logger. One good place is
http://www.chroniclenetworks.com/~dwm/Logger.htm
Another place is www.itis.net/golist but I can't seem to reach that site
anymore. FYI - The current version is 6.11.
Rob
"W6RCecilA" <Cecil.A.Moore@IEEE.org> wrote in message
news:38395429.17F45BD@IEEE.org...
> Rob wrote:
> > Well the best software I have ever used for SCS PTC II is LOGGER.
>
> Anybody know where to find the "LOGGER" program. A web search
> turned up too many entries to be able to find it.
> --
> 73, Cecil, W6RCA http://www.mindspring.com/~w6rca
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 23:06:28 -0500
From: "Rob" <NoEmail@NoWay.com>
Subject: Software for SCS Pactor-II
I agree it is not a secret. But if you look at the ads in QST for the PTC
II etc, the ads mention RTTY, PACTOR etc but do not mention PSK31!
73's
Rob
"Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604" <faunt@netcom.com> wrote in message
news:wo1yabqxll7.fsf@netcom17.netcom.com...
>
> "Rob" <NoEmail@NoWay.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Hi Cecil,
> >
> > The PTCIIe does support PSK31. (I don't know why SCS does not advertise
> > that the PTC II and the PTCIIe support PSK31!)
> >
> I certainly ran across it somewhere. It's not a secret.
>
> > I also use PTC II for SSTV using JVComm32. It works really well! (I am
not
> > sure but I would think that the PTCIIe also supports SSTV). I have also
>
> Does, according to the manual. The PTCIIe manual is available as a
> PDF file from SCS (English and German).
>
> I'm heading in the direction of a IIe myself.
> 73, doug
>.
------------------------------
Date: 23 Nov 1999 09:08:37 GMT
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@rising.com.au>
Subject: Software for SCS Pactor-II
Rob <NoEmail@NoWay.com> wrote:
> It also will transmit and receive PSK31 using a soundcard. Logger has split
> screen, message buffers, type ahead buffer etc for PSK31. Logger is much
> better than G3PLX's program for PSK31 and a soundcard.
Which is not to say that G3PLX's program is bad, I hope. Most of the
people I talk to seem to use Logger, but I use G3PLX's PSK31SBW and
it seems just fine to me, without any addons.
(I think one of the addons is a type ahead addon or similar;
could never work out why this was needed, as mine seems to support
type ahead just fine!)
Cheers
Hamish VK3SB
--
Hamish Moffatt Mobile: +61 412 011 176 hamish@rising.com.au
Rising Software Australia Pty. Ltd. http://www.risingsoftware.com/
Phone: +61 3 9894 4788 Fax: +61 3 9894 3362 USA: 1 888 667 7839
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 09:10:21 +0100
From: "Piero" <picaruso@dontwriteme.com>
Subject: Where docs for pactor, amtor, clover, etc...
W6RCecilA ha scritto nel messaggio
<38353D14.31EFF696@IEEE.org>...
> To you, it sounds like someone didn't
>listen before transmitting but there's no one there to
listen. ......
>--
>73, Cecil, W6RCA http://www.mindspring.com/~w6rca
It should be reasonable to move unattended PACTOR
trasmissions
to the same PACKET's portion of the band, and/or let
PSK trasmissions
move to CW and RTTY slice.
Since (good) PSK emissions are alike CW signals, I'd
hope that PSK
could operate anywhere in the band like CW does!!
73's de IK2VTJ, Piero.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:08:09 -0600
From: Jeff Goodspeed <cmsx42@email.mot.com>
Subject: WTB: Kantronics - KAM Plus
Oops!
Sorry about multiple listing - my browser kept saying "message not
sent".
> Jeff – KA9S
>
>.
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V99 #300
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
