| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 10.10.99 06:54l 200 Lines 6413 Bytes #-9724 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_99_255B
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 99/255B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<OK0PAB<HA5OB<HA3PG<
SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 991010/0116Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:7001 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:HD_99_255
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA21023 ; Sun, 10 Oct 99 01:00:24 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00016310 ; Sat, 09 Oct 99 22:26:38 MET
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 99 22:25:04 MET
Message-Id: <hd_99_255B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 99/255B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
4. The spec says the telemetry field and the comment field are optional,
and each field follows mandatory data. I assume this means you can only
have *one* of these fields at a time, not both.
I assume also that the optional comment field cannot start with 60/27/1D
hex (otherwise it would be confused with a telemetry field).
Are these assumptions correct?
Can you help?
73
Ian, G3NRW
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Editor: RSGB's RadCom "Data" column. |
| email: g3nrw@arrl.net |
| AX.25: G3NRW @ GB7ZPU.#21.GBR.EU |
| |
| INTRODUCTION TO APRS: http://www.netro.co.uk/whitepaper.htm |
| APRS PROTOCOL SPEC: http://www.tapr.org/tapr/html/aprswg.html |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>.
------------------------------
Date: 8 Oct 1999 14:34:41 GMT
From: "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@harvee.billerica.ma.us>
Subject: Japanese packet radio hinted at on TAPR site.
John Miles <jmiles@pop.removethistomailme.net> wrote:
> Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>>
>> also within the past few months, someone has posted on this newsgroup
>> experiments with gunnplexors and ethernet cards running high-speed
>> microwave links. It seemed not terribly well documented and not
>> terribly reproducible.
> Hmm, did you see this one? If it were any better-documented I think I'd
> have carpal-tunnel syndrome from all the typing. :-)
heh. then you would be forced to use speech recognition like me. I
was injured back in '94 and still don't have a lot of hand/arm
functionality although I am recovered somewhat.
> http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx
I just look at it. It looks fantastic from a documentation and
performance perspective. All I need now is someone I can buy some
complete kits of parts + PC board from. I also need to find some low
yield nuclear weapons to eliminate some of the "path obstacles"
between here and there...
I think I was attracted to the 1 Mb Slovenian radios because they
seemed like you did not need an optical line of sight path when
establishing a link. At microwave frequencies, I'm clearly going to
need to get the transceiver above the tree line (at 80 feet).
> I wonder if you're thinking of Fredrik Oberg's page
> (http://w1.911.telia.com/~u91105482)? His work at 10 megabits/sec
> predated mine. And his English is a lot better than my Swedish, so I'm
> inclined to cut him a little slack even though there are some rough
> edges in the overall design and presentation.
yes, that is the one I'm thinking of.
--
Eric S. Johansson ka1eec esj@harvee.billerica.ma.us
This message was composed almost entirely using NaturallySpeaking
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 01:42:06 -0400
From: Mark <n3rdv@NOSPAMarrl.net>
Subject: Kam Plus firmware available
I have a version 6.1 firmware chip with the books. If anybody with
older firmware wants it
reply to me off list. I'm not sure if it's worth putting a price on it
here for fear of getting flamed.
--
Mark n3rdv@NOSPAMarrl.net remove NOSPAM to reply
Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot again.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 08:45:15 -0400
From: Jim Lynch <jwl@sgi.com>
Subject: MFJ-1278
It's a dos program but it works fine on Win95.
SimpTerm. ftp://ftp.mindspring.com/users/k4gvo/simptr24.zip
73,
Jim.
Christian Irrasch wrote:
>
> Hello friends...
>
> I wonder if there is a good terminal program for use with an MFJ-1278
> controller on a PC running Win95.
> For contests I use RTTY by WF1B but I need another programm for standard
> QSOs (perhaps freeware programm)
>
> Best regards
> Chris, OE8CIQ
>.
------------------------------
Date: 9 Oct 1999 07:54:12 GMT
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@rising.com.au>
Subject: PACTOR or AMTOR
On 20m at about 14.065 MHz I hear a lot of digital signals --
are these PACTOR or AMTOR or something else? They sound phase shift keyed
(like PSK31) but not continuous (bursty). I'm curious to know what
they are so I can consider buying a modem for it.
thanks
Hamish VK3SB
--
Hamish Moffatt Mobile: +61 412 011 176 hamish@rising.com.au
Rising Software Australia Pty. Ltd. http://www.risingsoftware.com/
Phone: +61 3 9894 4788 Fax: +61 3 9894 3362 USA: 1 888 667 7839
>.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 05:56:36 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Remote dialup via ham 2m etc?
nobody <nospamjkb@vcnet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:WZeL3.1045$QI5.48189@monger.newsread.com...
> Hello,
> Although I'm not a ham operator, I was wondering if the following was
> practical.
This list is for Amateur Radio operators who are interested in digital
communications via Amateur Radio.
>Could I use a portable or handheld computer, a modem, and a 2m
> radio (or maybe HF) to dial up a local ISP as opposed to using a cellular
> modem via either a repeater or some base station? Why would I do such a
> thing? I want to try to establish a real-time link for longer distances
or
> not exactly line of sight than what cell modems can do. Basically, we're
> talking out in the boonies (miles away).
As a Ham, my advice is that you quit pestering Hams and look into the
commercial equipment and services that do what you are wanting.
You can't use Ham gear to do it anyway, and if you did, you would end up
spending extra money for substandard performance, just for the privelege of
operating illegally and getting your butt in a crack.
>
> I realize that the bandwidth of the signal may present a problem in this
> scenario...
That would be a problem but not the only one, by any means.
> All constructive advise would be deeply appreciated!
Quit spamming this Ham Radio ng with non-ham bulldada.
--
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
To be continued in digest: hd_99_255C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
