| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 23.09.99 02:14l 281 Lines 7892 Bytes #-9770 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_99_237B
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 99/237B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0MW<DB0ERF<DB0HDF<DB0HOT<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<
OK0PHL<OK0PBB<OK0PAB<HA5OB<HA3PG<SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 990922/1957Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:1431 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:HD_99_237
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA19490 ; Wed, 22 Sep 99 19:39:17 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00015753 ; Wed, 22 Sep 99 21:16:40 MET
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 99 21:15:10 MET
Message-Id: <hd_99_237B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 99/237B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
there a gap somewhere in the 2.4ghz band. I need to look up a chart
again. It'd be funny if ham had priority, so if any hams complain
of interference, then I'd have to stop using the card.
On their website at
http://www.proxim.com/products/accessory/antapep.shtml
they show like a little parabolic antenna for use with these things. So,
it seems like some kind of gain antennas are legal. They call it
an 'outdoor antenna' so at least from the ads, it looks like going for
gain is legal under some circumstances.
Of course, with these guys there' s no 'content restrictions' as with
ham licensed stuff. I'm not sure how much range I could squeeze out
of unlicensed spread spectrum equipment on this band. Though
this one guy here says he got 4 miles -- probably line of site, but I
can get some interesting line of site paths with a little Radio Shack
antenna mounting stuff.
In-home/office data rate: 1.6 Mbps
Cordless modem speed: 56 Kbps, ITU-T V.90 & 3COM x2-compliant
Frequency: 2.4 GHz frequency band
Range: Up to 150-feet indoor and 300-feet outdoor
Roaming: Unrestricted throughout coverage area
Maximum computers per network: 10
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 06:55:10 -0500
From: "Tim Gooding" <tgooding@uswest.net>
Subject: Advice TenTec Pegasus
I am thinking about trying a TenTec Computer HF Radio:
the Pegasus. Any comments on this unit out there?
Thanks for any help
Tim
KD0YX
West Fargo, ND
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:07:13 GMT
From: amadeus@0SPAM.netcomuk.co.uk (Jim Dunnett)
Subject: DGPS MSK demodulation ???
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:42:02 +0200, "Francois Guillet" <F6FLT@theoffice.net>
wrote:
>Hi all
>
>I'm looking for info on MSK modulation used by DGPS transmitters in the 300
>Khz band.
>
>Thanks in advance for a possible help.
>
>Francois F6FLT
>guillet.francois@wanadoo.fr
You *may* get something by downloading some of the WUN newsletters
from http://www.wunclub.com
I always understood that DGPS used ordinary FSK. (?)
--
- 73 de Jim, g(m)4rga | If I were a blackbird,
amadeus%netcomuk.co.uk | I'd whistle and preen,
dynastic%cwcom.net | I'd fly over London
g4rga@gb7tjf.#45.gbr.eu | and shit on the Queen.
PGP Key: pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 | (Old Scottish Nursery Rhyme)
Rallies Info: www.netcomuk.co.uk/~amadeus
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:54:05 GMT
From: quatsein@island.net (Steve Carlisle)
Subject: FSK31, no not PSK31
Thanks George, I was beginning to think I may have misread
the reference.
Steve
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:10:36 -0500, "George T. Baker"
<w5yr@swbell.net> wrote:
>Yes, there is FSK31. It was developed by a Russian ham who markets Mix32W
>for amateur use in PSK31. He came up with the FSK version but it has not
>received much attention or press so far. His program costs $$ whereas
>PSK31 and Logger, et al are free and thus are getting wider distribution
>and attention.
>
>--
>72/73, George AMA 98452 R/C since 1964
>Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 54th year and it just keeps getting better!
>AutoPOWER Systems, Fairview, TX (30 mi NE Dallas) Collin County
>QRP-L QRP-ARCI FISTS NORCAL ZOMBIE ARS 10-X 33.2 N 96.6 W EM13RE
>
>
>"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote:
>>
>> Steve Carlisle <quatsein@island.net> wrote in message
>> news:37e5154a.54014055@news.cr.island.net...
>> > Clinton, you are not pulling my leg are you. I did not see any info in
>> > regards to FSK31 at the PSK31 website. Did I overlook something?
>> >
>> > Steve Carlisle
>>
>> Maybe the fact that it's PSK31, not FSK31 ... to the best of my
>> knowledge, there IS NO "FSK31."
>>
>> However, PSK31 looks pretty neat.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:11:40 -0400
From: "Carl R. Stevenson" <wa6vse@fast.net>
Subject: FSK31, no not PSK31
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
And I was apparently wrong. I had not heard of "FSK31."
Sorry.
- --
Carl R. Stevenson - WA6VSE
mailto:wa6vse@fast.net
http://www.users.fast.net/~wa6vse
NCI #1052
Director, NCI
Fellow, Radio Club of America
Senior Member, IEEE
Member, ARRL
Join NCI - Hams for the 21st Century!
Help modernize ham radio and assure its future survival!
http://www.nocode.org
Steve Carlisle <quatsein@island.net> wrote in message
news:37e6c8f3.165559495@news.cr.island.net...
> Thanks George, I was beginning to think I may have misread
> the reference.
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:10:36 -0500, "George T. Baker"
> <w5yr@swbell.net> wrote:
>
> >Yes, there is FSK31. It was developed by a Russian ham who markets
Mix32W
> >for amateur use in PSK31. He came up with the FSK version but it
has not
> >received much attention or press so far. His program costs $$
whereas
> >PSK31 and Logger, et al are free and thus are getting wider
distribution
> >and attention.
> >
> >--
> >72/73, George AMA 98452 R/C since 1964
> >Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 54th year and it just keeps getting
better!
> >AutoPOWER Systems, Fairview, TX (30 mi NE Dallas) Collin County
> >QRP-L QRP-ARCI FISTS NORCAL ZOMBIE ARS 10-X 33.2 N 96.6 W EM13RE
> >
> >
> >"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote:
> >>
> >> Steve Carlisle <quatsein@island.net> wrote in message
> >> news:37e5154a.54014055@news.cr.island.net...
> >> > Clinton, you are not pulling my leg are you. I did not see any
info in
> >> > regards to FSK31 at the PSK31 website. Did I overlook
something?
> >> >
> >> > Steve Carlisle
> >>
> >> Maybe the fact that it's PSK31, not FSK31 ... to the best of my
> >> knowledge, there IS NO "FSK31."
> >>
> >> However, PSK31 looks pretty neat.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3
iQA/AwUBN+b3ZZe+N6+q84HiEQLYagCgtPww8Sh1aMNi6wPBMNs1pldjAQYAoNY2
pn7r0bS/FwypfmLQncb9yc+F
=GRi5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 21:50:27 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Ham tcpip network = pipedream
<steve_sampson@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:7s41d2$hc8$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
>
> > I do not see why Hams using Radio is treated as being less important
> > in the US than it is in Europe.
>
> I don't see the facts.
Yes, I noticed that about you quite a while back, Steve.
I admire your valiant effort against a crushing handicap.
>You say Europe (and that covers quite a few
> square miles) is wired, and the US is not. Please provide us with the
> facts:
Steve is really starting to grasp at straws. Now he's going to try the old
"ask for unreasonable details" game, where you pretend that if your debating
opponent cannot win a trivia game, he is somehow considered incapable of
knowing anything at all. I've never seen anyone confident of their position
use this rather lame tactic in the past... Has anyone else?
I don't play that game, in any case.
>
> 1. How many 9.6 kbps and greater speed nodes are there?
Most are 19.2 fulldup, from what I understand. Most user access is 9.6kb.
Slower stuff does exist, of course.
> 2. Of those nodes, what is the average bytes per day transported
> over 20 miles?
That would depend, of course, upon the amount of data that European hams
decide to transport for over 20 miles in a given day.
> 3. Of those nodes, what is the average bytes per month transported
> over 20 miles?
That would depend, of course, upon the amount of data that European hams
decide to transport for over 20 miles in a given month.
To be continued in digest: hd_99_237C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
