| |
KB2VXA > DRAKE 17.05.11 00:15l 80 Lines 2671 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2880_VK6ZRT
Read: GUEST DK3UZ DL1LCA DG4IAK
Subj: Re: G0TEZ > perfectly tense
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<HB9EAS<OK0NHD<OE2XEL<OE6XPE<IW2OHX<IW0QNL<IK6ZDE<
VE3UIL<VK6ZRT
Sent: 110516/2300Z @:VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC #:2880 [Boyanup] $:2880_VK6ZRT
From: KB2VXA@VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC
To : DRAKE@WW
Hi Ian and all,
English as taught is perfect(ly) tense but the moment grads hit the
streets it becomes common and perfect(ly) forgotten. Handbag? Purse? It's
been pocketbook since satchel hit the bricks. Have you ever heard of
Handbagmo or Pursemo... Pocketbookmo? I doubt even Louis Armstrong did
either...................
<boo hiss boo, bad joke>
Oh I got the point alright, you didn't get the joke. (;->) Seriously,
perfect and future perfect tense exist here just that we never use them
in common speech. Future perfect is like I said, so obscure about the
only place you'll find it is in prophesy and since "common knowledge" has
it as nonexistant a Biblical timeline looks more like a corkscrew.
Hey doc, where'd the duck go?
/| ,
,/// /|
// // ,///
// // // //
// // || ||
|| || // //
|| || // //
|| || // //
|| || || ||
\\,\|,|\_//
\\)\)\\|/
)-."" .-(
//^\` `/^\\
// | | \\
,/_| 0| _ | 0|_\,
/` `"=.v.="` `\
/` _."{_,_}"._ `\
`/` ` \ ||| / ` `\`
`",_ \\=^~^=// _,"`
"=,\'-=-'/,="
'---'
Ifya made ttthhhat left toin at Albakoiky yudda seen me!
___
__ _/:::>__
/:/_/::/ _/::>
_/:(/:::\_/::/
_):::::::::::::\
_/::::::::::::::::\____
/ \:::::::::/ \
| ::/\ :::::::: / \:: |
/ ::/ \ :::::: / |:::/
/:::| \::::::::/ |:::\
/::::| \::::::/ |::::\
,------: \::::/ :------,
/ ___ \0 / \0 / ___ \
: ,-' ) ` `---' `---' ( `-, :
\_ \ ' ' \_ _/
\____\ \/
\ _______\________
\ ,-' )
\ ,- ,----------- _/
\ ,-' \\ ) _/
(___________/__________\\ /
:;;;\___________________)
______,:;;;;;;;;:______
/,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;\_
/;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;\_
/;;;;;;__;;;; ;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;\
73 de Warren
Station powered by JCP&L atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.
Message timed by NIST: 22:58 on 2011-May-16 GMT
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
