| |
M1BYT > RIGS 07.07.03 12:20l 31 Lines 1228 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 021433M1BYT
Read: GUEST DB0FHN
Subj: Re: Why not ssb handhelds ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0FSG<DB0GAP<DB0BOX<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<OK0PCC<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<
RZ6HXA<HA3PG<CT2GWY<GB7YKS<GB7FCR
Sent: 030707/1013Z @:GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU #:3465 [Blackpool] FBB-7.03a $:021433M1B
From: M1BYT@GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU
To : RIGS@WW
VK4XYL Opined with considerable skill:-
> Sounds good to me. I have an old Icom IC202 which only has 144.0 to 144.2
> SSB but was originally designed for portable use. I wasn't too happy with
> the builtin whip antenna, so I mounted a 2m quater wave on the back of my
> push bike carrier, added an external battery, and I was bike mobile on 2m
> SSB.
Did you have to ride the bike side-saddle to ensure proper modulation
Kathy ;-)
浜様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様�
� 73 from Harry, M1BYT @ GB7FCR.#16.GBR.EU �
麺様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様�
� International Museums Weekend 14th+15th June 2003 �
� www.ukradioamateur.org/imw/index.html �
麺様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様�
� The ARC's FL/RAE courses + Newcomers Intro to �
� to amateur radio:- http://www.ukradioamateur.org/ �
麺様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様曜様様様様様様様様様様�
� QTH: Garforth, W. Yorks.. � Timed 10:01 �
� harry.m1byt@tiscali.co.uk � 07 Jul 2003 �
藩様様様様様様様様様様様様様様様擁様様様様様様様様様様�
Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |