OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
KB2VXA > MOVIES   20.01.13 20:35l 24 Lines 866 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 32953_VK6ZRT
Read: GUEST DK3UZ
Subj: Re: VE3WBZ > Which one?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0MAK<DB0ERF<IZ3LSV<IV3YXW<HB9TVW<DB0ANF<UA6ADV<
      ZS0MEE<VE3UIL<VK6ZRT
Sent: 130120/1757Z @:VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC #:32953 [Boyanup] $:32953_VK6ZRT
From: KB2VXA@VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC
To  : MOVIES@WW

Hi Pete and all,

The only Dam Busters I remember is the original, never heard of another. 
There was a very interesting TV presentation after material was declassified 
that went into great detail beginning with failure of conventional bombs, 
then the idea behind an underwater explosion and development of the bomb. 
There were many failures in development using dummy bombs but persistant 
trial and error perfected it and the delivery.

Lemme see, The Man Who Never Was somehow brings to mind I Was Montey's 
Double, the story of deceiving the Germans into believing Montgomery was 
somewhere he wasn't. That's but a dim memory, I haven't seen that one in many 
years.

73 de Warren

Station powered by JCP&L atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.

Message timed by NIST: 17:42 on 2013-Jan-20 GMT



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 18.05.2024 20:51:46lGo back Go up