| |
KB2VXA > EMC 18.06.07 03:46l 43 Lines 1772 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 64516_NJ2AR
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK3XX > 10MHz wipeout
Path: DB0FHN<DB0NOE<DB0GAP<DB0GPP<DB0LX<DB0SEL<DB0ZDF<DB0LJ<ON4HU<DB0RES<
TU5EX<WA7V<KD4YAL<K2BJG<W1HAD<W1EDH<K1YON<K2PUT<WA2SNA<WB2SNN<KC2COJ<
NJ2AR
Sent: 070617/1253Z @:NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM #:64516 [Lakehurst] $:64516_NJ2AR
From: KB2VXA@NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
To : EMC@WW
Hi Gordon and all,
Leave it to your engineering journal to make sense, you can't fool an
engineer! Now it's falling into place but as you pointed out there still
is a threat of potential RFI. The 900MHz band is much like the 11M
garbage band being everything from soup to nuts is dumped there, in times
past licensed CBers had to put up with all sorts of interference (now
they've BECOME interference, hi) and hams experience the same on 900 and
being a secondary alocation have to step aside and not cause interference
to whatever the primary service is. (I don't know and I don't care, hi
again.) Yup, good old series resonance and a lot of it is done without
fixed capacitors or inductors, it's that lovely stripline printed board
like the one in your VHF/UHF SWR meter.
You bet we find the information more realistic than the media hype! It's
been pointed out that it's simply a bit of polish on 19th Century
physics, that was part of the fun we had with "debunking the myth". Now
if they can get around Tesla's blunders they won't light up the baby in
the pram as his nanny screams and shouts or burn out the local power
generator that just happened to resonate at the same frequency as my
hero's experimental apparatus.
Why did I mention lighting up the baby? My Tesla coil lit up every
student in the classroom, metal frame desks great receivers make young
Jedi. (;->)
73 de Warren
KB2VXA@NJ2AR.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
Station powered by JCP&L atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.
**************************************
Preserve the integrity of our network.
Stop Internet forwarding, use RADIO!
**************************************
Message timed by NIST: 13:21 on 2007-Jun-17 GMT
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
