| |
PB0AFK > DAMA 15.01.99 11:17l 58 Lines 1651 Bytes #-9550 (0) @ EU
BID : 22218-PB0AFK
Read: DH9MAG GUEST
Subj: Re^2: RE:PB0AFK/Packet info comminucatie
Path: DB0AAB<DB0MWS<DB0AHO<DB0KFB<DB0CZ<DB0GE<DB0LJ<DB0FHK<DB0SIF<DB0HSK<
PI8DRS<PI8ZWL<PI8APD<PI8GCB<PI8WFL<PI8VNW
Sent: 990114/1807Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:37003 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:22218-PB
From: PB0AFK@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : DAMA@EU
* TstHost for Dos v1.43b - registered to PB0AFK *
* UTC diff: -1, Local time: 14-01-1999 18:44:51 *
* The world according to Garp and PB0AFK(Henk) *
* Msg:43520 Bid:22218-PB0AFK
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄĶToplogo creator (c) 1997-1998 by PD0OLNºÄÄÄÄÄÄ
>X-Info: User S&F received from DH0GHU at DB0CZ
>
> de DH0GHU @ DH0GHU.DB0CZ.#BW.DEU.EU (Ulrich)
> to DAMA @ WW
>
>Hello,
Hello Ulrich,
>PB0AFK's file contains the information, that TheFirmware 2.4a is compatible
>with DAMA.
>That's not true.
>TF2.4a was compatible to the old DAMA protocol.
First of all, you are right . I only did a resend of a bulletin written by
a ON and with a comment from a OE station so I'am not the writer. I had a
version v2.4c which did have DAMA old or new version I cannot say.
I did however know that the bulletin was not new, but I did not modified
it.
>Some years ago, the DAMA protocol was modified, only TF2.7 and later are
>compatible to the new specifications. Users of older versions risks their
>QSOs being killed.
My Tf 2.4c eprom still works fine in my PK-88. I seems a problem to get a
good working TF 2.7b eprom for the Pk-88. Tf 2.7(a) is not recommended
because of to many bugs.
>The "new" (some years old) DAMA specification is used for example by
>FlexNet (RMNC/ and PC/), XNET and TheNetNode.
Tnx for your correction on the resend of the DAMA-bulletin. To other
readers please take notice.
>
>73
>Ulrich DH0GHU @DB0CZ.#BW.DEU.EU
73 de Henk
Pc :486Dlc/40MHz
Tnc:AEA Pk-88
Trx:Bosch Kf-161
Ant:Dualband 2m/70cms
Created by Mes_filter v1.06c
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
