| |
F4ASK > CB 06.03.01 09:44l 76 Lines 2738 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 440341F4ASK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: CB on packet
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<OE3XSR<OK0NF<OK0PKL<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<
DB0GOS<DB0PKE<DB0QS<ON6AR<ON1CED<ON0CK<ON0DOR<ON0HU<F6CMN<F5KBM<F5KDV<
F8KAE<F6KOH
Sent: 010202/0644Z @:F6KOH.FNOR.FRA.EU #:30301 [LE HAVRE] FBB7.00g25 $:440341F4
>From f4ask%f6koh.fnor.fra.eu@on4hu-5.ampr.org Fri Feb 2 11:06:33 2001
Received: from on4hu-5.ampr.org by on4hu-5.ampr.org (JN111F_LIN) with SMTP
id AA262456 ; Fri, 02 Feb 2001 11:06:33 CET
Message-Id: <440341f4ask@f6cmn.bbs>
>From: f4ask@f6koh.fnor.fra.eu
From: F4ASK@F6KOH.FNOR.FRA.EU
To : CB@WW
Hi
Derrick wrote :
<It's been awhile since I took my tests but I seem to remember
<studying some stuff about third party traffic. If I recall
<correctly, it goes something like this: You can transmit
<third party traffic between stations in countries that allow
<third party traffic, provided you are "in control" of the
<transmitting station, and are to be held liable for all info
<that is transmitted. I don't have the exact words at hand,
<sorry.
<This means I could put my five year old daughter on my radio
<and have her talk with her grandmother through another ham
<on the other end. Provided I am able to stop the trans-
<mission if anything illegal is transmitted or about to be
<transmitted, there is nothing wrong with this, even though
<neither my daughter nor her grandmother are licensed to use
<amateur radio.
<The only possible dangers here are:
<1. Packet radio may enter countries where third party
traffic is not allowed, thus violating the law in
question, and
<2. If the CB operators decide to act in violation of
amateur radio laws in their messages, the stations
that relay it along its path (every one of them) are
each individualy liable for re-transmitting that
violation. (As would be the case if a licensed ham
decided to act in violation, putting illegal material
out onto the packet network)
<Am I mistaken? 73 de Derrick / KD7FTR
Ok, Derrick, you are very right.
The third party traffic is forbiden in France and many other countries in
Europe.
What the european sysops can do to protect our european packet net when
such bulls are arriving on BBS's ?
For them that's a real problem and more work to do only to respect
national rules.
If any bulls as in example nø2 are send on the net, that's becoming an
impossible task for sysops.
If possible, sysops in every countries where third party traffic is
allowed must sort out the bulls and countries to forward them.
But that's also more work for them : What is the solution ? I don't know !
or suppress third party traffic... but...Wwoooo !
73 de Gilbert
73 - Gilbert, F4ASK @ F6KOH-1
F4ASK@F6KOH.FNOR.FRA.EU
E-mail : F4ASK@wanadoo.fr
Message envoy‚ … : 08:39 utc le 02 Feb 2001
Message envoy‚ par WinPack-AGW V6.51 Enregistr‚/Registered
PC Syrix P166 133 Mhz
RTX : ALINCO DR-605 5W 430.600 Mhz
MODEM: Baycom AM7911 + AGWpe by SV2AGW
Biband. Colin. ant. 5X5/8 UHF 2X5/8 VHF
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
