| |
VK3KJC > BPQ 09.02.00 15:07l 34 Lines 1091 Bytes #-9743 (0) @ WW
BID : 6C0476VK3KJC
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Solution to BPQ32
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<PP5BLU<WB7AWL<N7NEI<KA6EYH<
VK7AX<VK3BBS<VK3ATL
Sent: 000209/1129Z @:VK3ATL.#WEV.VIC.AUS.OC #:46441 [East Geelong]
From: VK3KJC@VK3ATL.#WEV.VIC.AUS.OC
To : BPQ@WW
Quoting:
> From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
> To : BPQ@WW
......
>>One factor stopping Flexnet becoming more popular and, therefore, more
>>attractive for companies like Kantronics to build it into their TNC's is
>>the myth that Flexnet does not work with KISS TNC's.
> It is not a myth, it doesn't work good and not at all in most cases.
> You can't control the tnc from flexnet, set txd and so on ......
You are obviously not familiar with all that Flexnet can do. It is
working well for me AND I CAN SET TXD. It is currently set to 37 which is
equal to 370 ms. By changing this setting, the change in transmit delay
is quite evident, therefore it can be done.
......
> If you have a non tnc2 compatible tnc are you stuck with kiss, but most
> people don't care, they are not aware of te problems with kiss.
And if they are then stuck with KISS mode for their TNC's, why not use it
with Flexnet? Does BPQ work better with KISS than Flexnet?
Cheers - Ken, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Message timed: 22:24 on 09 Feb 00
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
