| |
N5PVL > BPQ 27.08.99 06:09l 22 Lines 675 Bytes #-9911 (0) @ WW
BID : 1607_N5PVL
Read: DL7AMN DB1RAS GUEST SQ9DHS
Subj: Re: BPQ x FlexDigi
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0AIS<DB0IZ<ON6AR<WB0TAX<N5VGC<N5PVL
Sent: 990825/1218Z 1607@N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM [EM13OT] $:1607_N5PVL
From: N5PVL@N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
To : BPQ@WW
>
>If you think Linux is useful, that may explain why you think
>Flexnet is better than BPQ: simple lack of knowledge.
>
For my part, I agree that Linux is a joke, but I have learned to take
FlexNet very seriously. That was because FlexNet worked exactly as
advertised, and Linux was a dismal waste of my time and money.
A debate as to which is better for general use; BPQ or FlexNet is pretty easy
to resolve.
BPQ is obsolete, no longer developed. No future, despite it's great past.
BPQ is difficult to set up and operate properly without assistance. FlexNet
is easy to set up and properly run.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
