| |
IN3ASW > BPQ 07.08.99 16:19l 35 Lines 1223 Bytes #-9932 (0) @ WW
BID : 6-IN3ASW
Read: DH6BB DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: BPQ vs. Flexnet.. my opinion
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<9A0BBS<
9A0YKZ<S50BOX<S50MBL<IV3LAV<IV3AVQ<IW3FPP<IW3GRX
Sent: 990807/0742Z @:IW3GRX.IVEN.ITA.EU #:51622 [Treviso]
From: IN3ASW@IW3GRX.IVEN.ITA.EU
To : BPQ@WW
Hi there..
just wanted to express my opinion on this debate :
After having tried both applications, I came to the following conclusions...
- with Flexnet, I didn't achieve a stable configuration. The system keeps
crashing over and over. I tried a lot of different settings without luck..
- Flexnet does not allow a local loop-back. If you have ,say, a DxCluster
running, there's no way to connect to , without passing through an external
station/node, to emulate users connections.
- with BPQ, I'm running 3 applications: Clusse as DxCluster, Winpack for
outgoing connections and monitoring, Tsthost for mailing and bulletins.
All these absolutely trouble-free. Thus, my son is able to play his games
while all keeps running in the background.
- the system NEVER crashes
- I don't care about any routing, as we are using Hi-Speed Supervozelj nodes.
So, for my requirement ( repeat, for MY requirement ) BPQ is what I need.
There's no question !
Thanks for reading.. es 73 de Gianni
Station description :
BPQ v4.08
Windows 95
Clusse v0.31 , Winpack 6.4 , Tsthost 1.43b
Symek TNC2S & TNC2H , Kenwood TR-7800 & TM-732
PC Clone Cx6x86 166Mhz/32mb
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
