| |
SM7UZI > BPQ 04.08.99 23:33l 34 Lines 1594 Bytes #-9936 (0) @ WW
BID : SM7UZI6266
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Obsolesence
Path: DB0AAB<DB0FSG<DB0SL<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<OK0PKL<DB0MAK<DB0SON<DB0ERF<DB0NHM<
DK0MNL<DF0HMB<DB0MAR<DB0IL<OZ5BBS<OZ4PAC<OZ4BBS<OZ3BOS<OZ3PAC<OZ6BBS<
SK7IQ
Sent: 990804/1758Z @:SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU #:45302 [Malmö] $:SM7UZI6266 FBB7.00
From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
To : BPQ@WW
Hello!
>Now I don't say Net/Rom is obsolete,no, it is a good protocol.
No it isn't!
It adds to much overhead, the quallity measurement isnt any good (much better
to use round trip time) and the routing information is updated to seldom.
There is much that could be better!
>There are better alternatives if you want to stay in the "Net/Rom gang"
Then use x-net or the net node, they can both use net/rom and flexnet but the
protocols used between thenetnodes or x-nets nodes etc is much better than the
net/rom used by bp.
>There is LinuxNet which has Net/Rom and is compatible to Flexnet.
Is it the same old net/rom as bpq, not improved in any way like thenetnodes is?
But it is although its improvements not as good as flexnet.
>Stations that are "sandwitched" between both systems should consider using it.
They can also use x-net and some others!
.a&$a. .a&$a. .a&$$$$$$$$$$&a. .a&$a. Anders Lageras
$$$$$$ $$$$$$ $$$$$$$' `$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Lund Sweden JO65PQ
$' `$$ $$$$$$ `ý$$$$$s,s$$$$$ý $$$$$$ AARS Member No. 81
$s,s$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$' `$ Packet:
73 de SM7-$$$$$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$s,s$ SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
$$$$$$ $$' `$ a$$$$$$ý $$$$$$ E-mail: sm7uzi@qsl.net
$$$$$$a$$s,s$ a$$$' `$$$$$$&a. $$$$$$ ICQ#: 5161379
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$s,s$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Homepage:
`ý&$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$$$$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$ý' http://www.visitweb.com/uzi/
o==|=====-
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
