| |
SM3LKS > BPQ 28.01.99 14:41l 31 Lines 958 Bytes #-10128 (0) @ WW
BID : 29424_SM3LKS
Read: DH6BB SP6VXT DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: Re: RE: BPQ vs FLEXNET
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<DB0ERF<DB0MW<DK0MNL<DF0HMB<
DB0HRO<OZ4BOX<OZ7PAC<OZ3PAC<OZ3BOC<OZ6BBS<SK7CY<SK6FV<SK6YW<SK6BA<
SK6LK<SM7FEJ<SK7HR<SK7GC<SK5AS<SK5BN<SK5UM<SK5AE<SK5BB<SK4HC<SM4UMY<
SK4KS<SK4WV<SM4TYA<SM3ESS<SK3BG<SK3UB<SK3JR<SM3LKS
Sent: 990120/2214Z @:SM3LKS.Z.SWE.EU #:29424 [Ostersund] FBB7.00g $:29424_SM3LK
From: SM3LKS@SM3LKS.Z.SWE.EU
To : BPQ@WW
SM7UZI wrote:
>>> Flexnet supports all tncs.
>>Rubbish!
>No!
>6pack can be used with any tnc, there for does flexnet support any tnc.
>
>>> But they need a 6pack firmware, that is the problem.
>>Therefore FlexNet does NOT support all TNC's.
>The firmware and tnc doesn't support 6pack and flexnet.
>But the opposite is not true!
>
>Since kiss not is a good protocol and because of that can't be used with
>flexnet, the problem is not that thare are no kiss driver for flexnet
>avaliable.
>The only solution is to use another protocol than kiss.
>A 6pack driver is avalible, so only a 6pack firmware for the tnc is needed.
KISS is not, and has never been, a protocol.
When will you learn that ?
KISS is a way to let the programmer have full control over the
packet-protocol he/she want to use.
It is a HDLC-driver in either software for SCC-cards, or in the TNC-EPROM.
But is isn't any protocol.
73 de SM3LKS
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
