| |
PY3SS > BPQ 15.01.99 12:17l 33 Lines 1010 Bytes #-10142 (0) @ WW
BID : 649723SS
Read: DH6BB SP6VXT DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: Re: bpq vs flexnet
Path: DB0AAB<DB0MWS<DB0RBS<DB0SEL<DB0WTS<DB0GOS<DB0FBB<DB0HSK<DB0ERF<DB0ABZ<
DB0CEL<DB0EWB<DB0HHW<DB0IL<OZ5BBS<OZ4PAC<OZ8PAC<7M3TJZ<JM1YSB<JP3SQH<
JP3SQH<JA3QNI<JI3ZAG<JG8DYF<JH8ZBU<JH8ANK<JM1YOF<JM1YOF<JA0BXP<JH1RFM<
JL1ZBF<JI1ZMW<JN1YLY<JH4RMH<7K3RPC<JK1ZRW<JK1ZRW<7M3TJZ<WB8NWQ<VK7AX<
WB0TAX<KA3FMO<PP5BLU<PY3KW<PY3SS
Sent: 990104/1149Z @:PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA #:64972 DOS_FBB7.00g $:64972_PY3SS
From: PY3SS@PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA
To : BPQ@WW
>>
>>It could mean that PC/FlexNet has not been fully developed yet, with
>>problems such as having to select either the latest or a superseded
>>version of the serial drivers depending on your computer system, while BPQ
>>has very few, if any, bugs.
>Flexnet is probably the most bug free packet software there have ever been.
>Bpq still contain bugs.
>
Yes, the so called "BUG" in BPQ allows me to run it under W95 without problem.
The "bugfree" FlexNet and that "thing" called "TFEMU" don't allow that.
Even XSCC and USCC drivers didn't. I have tried all but to no avail.
Try running FLEXNET + FBB + NETSCAPE + some other software on the same machine
under W95 to see the problems with FlexNet SCC drivers.
I didn't get that running on a K6-2/300 with 128 MB RAM and an USCC card.
The computer slows down and crashes sometime.
Best 73 de Marcelo __o
PY3SS@PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA _`\-\,
________________________(_)/ (_)__
mark@plug-in.com.br
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
