| |
SM7UZI > BPQ 05.01.99 07:47l 85 Lines 3569 Bytes #-10154 (0) @ WW
BID : SM7UZI4407
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: re:bpq selfinstaller
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0BOX<DB0MAK<DB0HOT<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<SP6KBL<DB0GRL<
SR6DJG<SR9ZAA<KA3FMO<WB0TAX<N9DBX<KF9UG<7M3TJZ<OZ8PAC<OZ4PAC<OZ4BBS<
OZ3BOS<OZ3PAC<OZ3BOC<OZ6BBS<SK7IQ
Sent: 990104/2213Z @:SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU #:59109 ððùHappyùNewùYearù1999ùðð
From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
To : BPQ@WW
>Bad working?
The packet driver and the quallity measurement mainly.
>It have always, note: ALWAYS worked perfect
>here (while I used it) and also the BPQ-node at my homeBBS.
>It runs and runs and runs....while FlexNet is full busy
>with crashing the whole time...
I have never doubted the stability of bpq!
The problem is the capabillity of the software.
Now a days are software that is as stable and much better packet drivers and
nodes avaliable.
But flexnet is very stable and probably are most other nodes that to.
That you cant get flexnet to work is probably caused by your configuration
of the computer.
Load flexnet in ms- or open-dos with out any thing else like mem managers etc
and you will find it very stable.
I use it with dr-opendos and the mem manager that comes with it and that works
just fine.
>[sm7uzi]
>>The reason why bpq is so widly used isnt because is is better than other
>>program.
>>It is because it once was a good node, and most hams are very
>conservative and the lack of knowledege is also a strong reason.
>BPQ is still a well operating node-software...in this slowspeed and
>boring area we don't need more ;-)
To reson like that isn't very good, but most hams probably do so.
The adaptive parameters of flexnet would have helped alot here, varying link
load and conditions wouldn't be any problem any more.
Also the parameters that probably isn't right set wouldn't be that either.
The net/rom overhead wouldn't make the connections even slower.
>But the lack of time restarting FlexNet several times every day got me
>tired of it...sorry.
>I agree in one point, I wish to see a change in the area here with a
>faster packetnetwork.
To replace bpq is the first step to make it possible.
Bpq has served well, but now is it time for a new generation of packet
software to enter the arena.
>But as long nobody else is changing or adding this stuff, there is
>no meaning to develop it. (yes, I'm depressed and desperate by now)
The net/rom protocoll used by bpq have been changed.
There is a new much better version which is not used by bpq, it is used by
thenetnode.
The Flexnet protocoll is still to prefer.
>And yes, the hams here are very conservative.
Yes indeed they are.
>I'm actually dealing with Linux 2.0.36 on the other drive at this machine.
>And I hope to get it kompiled with the ax25-stuff to see
>if I'm able to get it working...hope so..
Flexnet for linux will come.
>My "make" was not working yesterday, will have to look at my compiler...
I can just wish you good luck.
>I'm still dreaming on a superfast tcp/ip-link here, with access
>to internet, that would have been something!
That would be nice.
You probably first have to find a way to use BPQ for highspeed packet.
>But there seems to be no interest around here... :-(
That is sad but true.
.a&$a. .a&$a. .a&$$$$$$$$$$&a. .a&$a. Anders Lageras
$$$$$$ $$$$$$ $$$$$$$' `$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Lund Sweden JO65PQ
$' `$$ $$$$$$ `ý$$$$$s,s$$$$$ý $$$$$$ AARS Member No. 81
$s,s$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$' `$ Packet:
73 de SM7-$$$$$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$s,s$ SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
$$$$$$ $$' `$ a$$$$$$ý $$$$$$ E-mail: anders.lageras@usa.net
$$$$$$a$$s,s$ a$$$' `$$$$$$&a. $$$$$$ ICQ#: 5161379
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$s,s$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Homepage:
`ý&$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$$$$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$ý' http://www.visitweb.com/uzi/
o==|=====-
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
