| |
VK5QX > CLOSED 02.01.05 13:45l 71 Lines 2084 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 000959VK5QX
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Closure of BBS
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<VE3FJB<ZL2TZE<VK5UJ<VK5BRC<
VK5SPG<VK5LZ
Sent: 041231/1844Z @:VK5LZ.#ADL.#SA.AUS.OC #:33493 [Elizabeth] $:000959VK5QX
From: VK5QX@VK5LZ.#ADL.#SA.AUS.OC
To : CLOSED@WW
ADDITIONAL COMMENT
A bulletin provided by G0FTD contained the following:-
__________
" VK5ATB wrote:-
>Just a quick note to say that VK5ATB BBS will be closed tomorrow the
>31st of December and will not be reopening.
>I will not be using packet so please do not send any mail via this
>medium as it will not reach me.
Is it true that one of your VK5 users dobbed you in to the ACA for
alledged offences under the: (sic)
Australian Imaginary Amateur Radio Offences Act 2003 ?
Ah well you wouldn't be the only one "
__________
(At the end of the bulletin there also appeared one of those stupid little
meaningless and unrecognised "squiggles".)
Perusal of this bulletin certainly indicates several questions that can be
raised as well as comment to be made.
On what real evidence has he based any of his inferences that would seem,
by inference, to sully the character and good name of other people?
The bulletin from G0FTD conveniently ignores the fact that Trevor (Pops)
VK5ATB quite clearly requested that people NOT direct any messages to him
via Packet Radio.
Such extremely bad manners as shown by G0FTD surely warrants comment as
well as some explanation.
G0FTD also, on a completely groundless basis, infers that VK5ATB may have
committed some kind of breach of regulations.
What sort of a person takes such an attitude towards another?
He also infers, again without any substance, that some formal action may
have been taken against VK5ATB by authorities.
I am sure that Trevor would not be impressed by such inferences.
What a pity that someone should write such as to cast a slur on the
operations of an excellent SYSOP of long-standing.
G0FTD certainly needs to take a long look at himself and then hang his
head in shame.
I also query the meaning of the last statement in the bulletin from G0FTD.
Could he perhaps oblige with a proper explanation as to the true and full
meaning of this nebulous statement?
Regards,
Ian
__________
73 de Ian, VK5QX
@ VK5LZ.#ADL.#SA.AUS.OC
01 Jan 2005
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
