OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK4XYL > WOEFUL   04.08.03 02:00l 45 Lines 1483 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 350016VK4XYL
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: G6KUI vs VK6BE
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<VE2PAK<KD7HAH<VK3TE<VK4TRS<VK4DGQ<
      VK4WIE
Sent: 030803/2339Z @:VK4WIE.#BNE.QLD.AUS.OC #:56945 [Brisbane] FBB7.00g
From: VK4XYL@VK4WIE.#BNE.QLD.AUS.OC
To  : WOEFUL@WW


>As Sysop of GB7DBY it is my responsibility to vet messages for such
>disgusting
>words as VK6BE used. That is also the reason that VK6BE is now on reject
>here,
>so that I will not be subject to any more of his swear words - this
wasn't
>the first occurance of swear words by VK6BE on packet as others have
>testified.

I have to admit I'm having a major problem here with these allegations,
I've been on and off packet for quite a few years now, and I cannot recall
any bull from VK6BE that contained a swear word.

Seems to me we got either of two occurrences here, first, that someone
unknown used the BE call to smear his good name, or, second, that the KUI
perceptions of what exactly is a swear word is a LOT different from the
perceptions of most of the rest of us.

I think we need to get this cleared up, and one way is we need to know the
word in question. My e-mail address is at the end of this bull, and I'd
very much appreciate some kind person sending me the word/words that are
upsetting G6KUI. And don't worry about it offending me, been many years
since I was shocked at human behaviour!

Many thanks in advance


73 and 88 - Kathy, VK4XYL @ VK4WIE-1

E-Mail: vk4xyl@optusnet.com.au

Message timed: 08:41 on 04-Aug-2756 AUC
Message sent using WinPack-AGW V6.51

73 and 88 - Kathy, VK4XYL @ VK4WIE-1

E-Mail: vk4xyl@optusnet.com.au

Message timed: 08:41 on 04-Aug-2756 AUC
Message sent using WinPack-AGW V6.51


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 04.10.2025 15:30:39lGo back Go up