OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
DJ5AV  > ANTENNEN 06.06.06 01:18l 20 Lines 815 Bytes #999 (7) @ WW
BID : J0EVNPOE9XPI
Read: GUEST DG1VV DJ7AM OE7HNT DG5YM DC3RJ DL7NDF DD6ZJ DG7NCH DM3ER
Subj: HB9ABX "New 10m antenna"
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0SL<DB0FSG<DB0ZKA<DB0GPP<DB0LX<DB0CZ<OE9XPI
Sent: 060606/0016z @:OE9XPI.AUT.EU [Bregenz JN47VM] DP6.00 $:J0EVNPOE9XPI
From: DJ5AV @ OE9XPI.AUT.EU (Michael)
To:   ANTENNEN @ WW 

Dear friends,
I do not like the way Felix is arguing for his mobile antenna.
He tries to proof the outstanding performance by 6 announces 
on 10m on DX Summit.
But his announces are only an extract of the DX announces for that 
time frame.
That's just what I hate with politicians: announcing selected facts
for the full truth.

I have some experience with mobile QSOing on 10m: Already with a
very simple aerial you will produce a signal to get the question:
Are you really mobile ?
My opinion is that you have a better antenna situation on the mobile
than the guy with 100 Watts and a groundplane with only 2 radials 
per band (and radials on or under the roof).
I believe in fairy tales - but not with new antennas. 

73 de Mike, DJ5AV @ OE9XPI.AUT.EU


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 24.03.2025 04:28:36lGo back Go up