OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
G0FTD  > AGW      11.05.04 21:47l 44 Lines 1683 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : C75339G0FTD
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Just My Thought
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<IK1ZNW<ZL2TZE<ED1ZAC<GB7YKS<GB7YFS<
      GB7LGS<GB7WIG
Sent: 040511/1327Z @:GB7WIG.#34.GBR.EU #:51094 XFBB7.03 Bid:C75339G0FTD
From: G0FTD@GB7WIG.#34.GBR.EU
To  : AGW@WW


KD4POR wrote:-
> As we have been talking about the AGW/PE uses ram without freeing it after
> its done with a process causeing a crash. I look at sound card operation 
> as a  'poor mans packet' system. it works fine but I dont think it was ment 
> to run 24/7, I could be wrong. If it was not for the AGW/PE I would not have 
> gotten back on packet so I do think its a great thing.

Several points.

AGW is great, but then other soundcard systems don't have the memory
bug. Mixw and others run forever with no problems. I wish it were
possible to somehow interface Winpack with Mixw and use Mixw as the packet
engine instead, much more stable.

The big problem with many users is that they all claim AGW works when
it doesn't. No one has seriously tested the software. All they do is
run it for an hour, read one or two messages and get back to watching the
TV. 

Many users have lots of RAM and so even after a few hours AGW still runs.
But that doesn't mean AGW is ok, it just means the crash has been delayed.

Perhaps Mr AGW got fooled the same way ;-)

I also read the comments from the ZL station (sorry can't remember callsign
as I type this), but I agreed 100% with his comments too.




                          ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
                          ³     73 - Andy      ³     
                          ³       G0FTD        ³    
                          ³  Whitstable, Kent  ³    
                          ³    Winpack-AGW     ³     
                          ³  ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿   ³    
                          ³  ³ Û           ³   ³    
                          ÀÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÙ 
                   


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 22.09.2026 12:07:05lGo back Go up