| |
VK3JMA > WLAN 25.09.03 22:50l 55 Lines 1487 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 540234VK3JMA
Read: GUEST DB0FHN OE5RCO DK5RAS DO6NP
Subj: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<VK6HGR<VK3TE<VK3AYM<
VK3DSE
Sent: 030925/0736Z @:VK3DSE.#MEL.VIC.AUS.OC #:59189 [Narre Warren] FBB7.00g25
From: VK3JMA@VK3DSE.#MEL.VIC.AUS.OC
To : WLAN@WW
VK5QX wrote:-
> What VK3JMA wrote was quite rude.
>
You are dead right there, I set out to be rude!
> The comments in reply to what constituted an "attack" by VK3JMA were
> probably warranted.
>
You probally missed the original bulletin then
> In the reply the person writing (presumably G8PZT) made comments that were
> of a general nature, and no doubt prompted by the initial rudeness that
> was encountered.
Which ever way I try to apply an acronym to PZT I always come up
with......
"Negative Negative Negative"
I started this WLAN topic trying to spur an interest in what, in my
opinion, should be amateur radio's next step in digital communication but
it is people like PZT that have nothing but negativity to offer.
If that is what is left of the spirit of experimentation then I may as
well give up trying, but being the strong headed (stubbon) yobbo that I
am, no way, hit me with your best shots, and guess what, I will still be
standing when the smoke clears, with more information and ideas to share.
There you go, reply or not, I dont care. I will do what I want with
this great hobby no matter what.
Regards
Mark
Oh yea. I have already admitted in the public forum that "maybe my "not
worth a regards" was a bit steap", but it was said and there is only
moving forward from that.
-------------------------------
73 - Mark, VK3JMA
email: vk3jma@net2000.com.au
-------------------------------
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
