| |
W0RLI > WLAN 25.09.03 13:40l 151 Lines 3686 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 323W0RLI
Read: GUEST DB0FHN OE5RCO DK5RAS DO6NP
Subj: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0IGL<DB0FSG<OE7XLR<OE9XPI<DB0CZ<HB9EAS<HB9AJ<HB9AK<
K1UOL<N7QDN<n7qdn<KA7AGH<w0rli
Sent: 030924/0403 804@w0rli.or.usa.noam
<VK5QX@VK5LZ.#ADL.#SA.AUS.OC> wrote in message news:F30712VK5QX...
>
>
>
> To : WLAN@WW
>
>
> I JUST SAW THIS !!
>
> Sometimes one has to wonder.
>
> We all make mistakes, as far as I know, and sometimes we do need to have
> them pointed out.
>
> However, I just could not resist comment on the following:-
>
> __________
>
> " From :W0RLI @W0RLI.OR.USA.NOAM
> To :WLAN @WW
> Date/time :20-Sep 14:35
> Message # :136106
> Title :Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
> Path: !VK5LZ!VK5SPG!VK5ASF!WB0TAX!CT3MY!CT2GWY!N2BQF!KD4GCA!N1UAN!WB1CHU!
> !K1UGM!W1ON!W1ON-5!K1UOL!N7QDN!N7QDN!KB7ZPJ!
> R:030920/1435 25716@W0RLI.OR.USA.NOAM
>
> <G8PZT@GB7PZT.#24.GBR.EU> wrote in message news:000141261PZT...
> >
> > Subject: Re: VK3JMA It's not ham radio
> > X-Mailer: XServ v407 WebMail
> >
> > This is seriously off-topic sorry,
> >
> > VK3JMA wrote:-
> >
> > >Not worth a regards
> >
> > Whatever your intention, such a comment implies contempt for the
> > person to whom you are replying.
>
> Perhaps that was the intent.
>
> > This is one of the problems with packet - downright discourtesy.
> > Plus an excessive willingness to attack the character of anyone
> > with whom you disagree.
>
> As you have just done.
>
> > Most hams don't behave like this when they have a voice QSO.
>
> And done again.
>
> > No matter what the idealogical differences, Radio Hams
> > are usually civil to each other on voice, so why not
> > on Packet?
>
> And you did it again!
>
> > If *you* feel my views don't deserve a "Regards", then simply
> > use the neutral "73", and if you feel they don't even
> > deserve the common courtesy of a "73", don't put anything,
> > rather than making a derogatory comment.
>
> And yet again!
>
> --
>
> ... Hank
>
> Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
> W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net "
>
> ----------
>
> What VK3JMA wrote was quite rude.
Hi Ian, I see you can play the game too!
Attack the poster and not the poster's comments.
> The comments in reply to what constituted an "attack" by VK3JMA were
> probably warranted.
So?
> In the reply the person writing (presumably G8PZT) made comments that were
> of a general nature, and no doubt prompted by the initial rudeness that
> was encountered.
So?
> To my mind the comments and advice provided were quite considered and
> reasonable in their content.
What did they have to do with the topic?
Nothing.
> I believe that Hank's (W0RLI) remarks indicated either an extreme rudeness
> on his part or else a complete lack of understanding as to what the second
> writer was trying to suggest, namely, a little more courtesy.
I guess you have no knowledge of "humor" nor "irony".
> Hank's comments were not only rude and uncalled for; They sounded somewhat
> like a cracked record.
And there you go!
Doing exactly what you complain about.
> From quite a way back W0RLI was quite a respected callsign.
Oh? I thought I was abusive, abrasive and obnoxious.
> Hank had made an excellent contribution towards Amateur Radio,
> particularly in the digital field.
Just one of my many important accomplishments.
> It does unfortunately seem that something sour has crept into the (his)
> works. What a great pity!
Huh?
> Come on Hank! Lift your game a little.
Why?
> You have the ability to contribute a lot more yet, so let us see your
> reputation rise again from where it seems to have fallen.
Sorry, you appear to have avoided my recent contributions.
> Regards,
>
> Ian
Seems like all you can do is whine like the others.
Give it a shot ... try and post something positive!
--
... Hank
Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
