| |
GM0CSZ > WLAN 25.05.05 04:16l 33 Lines 1212 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 0B1935GM0CSZ
Read: DK5RAS GUEST DD4RD DO6NP DG1LCA
Subj: Re: Packet vs WiFi
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0HGW<ON0DXC<ON0LGE<SR1BSZ<SP7MGD<RZ6HXA<IK1ZNW<
GB7CRV<GB7FUR<GB7IOM<GB7SAN<GB7INV<GB7NOS
Sent: 050523/2109Z @:GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU #:33858 [Golspie] FBB7.00i $:0B1935GM0CS
From: GM0CSZ@GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU
To : WLAN@WW
ZL4AJS wrote:-
> This is the trouble Mark. No average ham wants to fuss with 'careful
> installations and persistance'. Especially at 2.4GHz this becomes
> fiddly. It's hard enough to get them onto 2m with a simple handheld
> sitting on the table let alone expecting them to do a good installation
> for 2.4GHz!
=======================================
In PA/PE/PD-land radio amateurs were permitted to use 2400 to 2450 MHz and
could experiment With Wireless LAN equipment .
However the Dutch authorities have now withdrawn this permission ,such
that this band can only be used by licenced amateurs for communication via
satellites.
Nevertheless on ham radio (flea)markets high gain antennas are
increasingly available (obviously for amateur satellite traffic only ;) )
In the USA there are no restrictions in the amateur 2.4 GHz band ,to my
knowledge.
73 - Frank , GM0CSZ @ GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU
Inver by Tain , IV20 1RX Scotland UK Loc: IO87AT
e-mail: gm0csz.kn6wh@dsl.pipex.com
Also in 2005 they say the future is bright ; 2 of its challenges remaining
to be RENEWABLE ENERGY and LINUX.
Message timed: 19:39 UTC on 23 May 2005
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
