| |
VK3JMA > WLAN 07.05.05 08:36l 20 Lines 663 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 210006VK3JMA
Read: DK3TB DG8DG DK5RAS GUEST DO6NP
Subj: Re: RE packet vs WiFi
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0AAB<F6KFT<DB0GE<DB0ZDF<DB0LJ<DB0SGL<DB0FHK<DB0SIF<
DB0EA<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<EA5AKC<EA5RQ<VK7AX<VK3AC<VK3AYM<VK3DSE
Sent: 050507/0308Z @:VK3DSE.#MEL.VIC.AUS.OC #:44640 [Narre Warren] FBB7.00g25
From: VK3JMA@VK3DSE.#MEL.VIC.AUS.OC
To : WLAN@WW
OE7FTJ wrote:-
> No, thats wrong! You have to meet the technical conditions about
> rf-bandwidth, max pep, etc. when using as an amateur radio equipment!
> So it is not simple to use a wifi device as an pure amateur radio dev
Again, maybe in Austria but not so elsewhere.
One could always use "non-ham-wifi" channels, and incapsulate our info in
a VPN (axip????) just as good old internet worm holes operate. I could
see no problem with using a private network infastructure (be it wifi or
wired lan) to carry Amateur Traffic so long as the ham related stuff was
not accessiable in/out of the VPN.
Mark
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
