| |
M5WJF > WLAN 06.05.05 07:13l 51 Lines 2035 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : A90624M5WJF
Read: DG8DG GUEST DK5RAS OE7FTJ DO6NP
Subj: Re: RE packet vs WiFi
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0WUE<DK0WUE<SP7MGD<GB7YKS<GB7PZT<GB7MAX
Sent: 050506/0019Z @:GB7MAX.#28.GBR.EU #:5605 [Bloxwich] $:A90624M5WJF
From: M5WJF@GB7MAX.#28.GBR.EU
To : WLAN@WW
Wolf OE7FTJ wrote:-
> The problem is the 20MHz bandwidth of _one_ channel!
> We have a telecom regulation authority here in Austria! In most of the
> european countries is only 1 MHz rf-bandwidth allowed in the 13cm band.
> In the 6cm band it is 10 MHz!
and then wrote:-
> In my area are two ATV links running in the 13cm band.
Doesn't ATV have at least a 9MHz bandwidth anyway? (maybe I'm wrong?)
Which would mean use of ATV on 13cms in Austria would be using more than
the 1MHz rf-bandwidth previously mentioned as applicable from the telecoms
authority?
The other point here is that any TX on Amateur Frequencies at 2.4GHz
should come under your Amateur Radio Licence rather than
etsi-wifi-conditions, if you're using these wifi links for exclusively
Amateur traffic.
For example, rather than 100mW ERP, that means 400W PEP is allowed in the
UK.
I can't see a downside to packet over wifi in Europe.
73 de Wayne M5WJF@GB7MAX.#28.GBR.EU
Tower PC : AMD Athlon XP 2200+ 1GB DDR
Windows XP Professional SP2
Packet Software : WinPack-Telnet V6.80
TELNET Link : 1Mbps ADSL / 56kbps PSTN
Message timed : 01:12 on 06 May 2005
ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ»
º Member RSGB, RAYNET HF Team, º
º West Cheshire RAYNET, MaxPak, º
º SARS, TARRG, BATC, RIG, RSARS, º
º Licensed by the MET Office º
º to receive Meteosat-8 Data º
ÌÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ͹
º Troop/Pack Assistant º
º 6th Shrewsbury Scout Group º
º Shropshire Borders District º
º Shropshire º
ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
Shoe Size 11 (UK), and a bowl of Alpen!
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
