| |
OE7FTJ > WIFI 05.05.05 09:11l 26 Lines 594 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 55FOE7XLR005
Read: OE5AKM DG5YM DK3TB GUEST DK5RAS IW3BRC OE7FTJ OE6OWG DO6NP OE8FKQ
Subj: Re: RE packet vs WiFi
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0FSG<OE7XLR
Sent: 050505/0805z @:OE7XLR.#OE7.AUT.EU [TCP/IP Node/BBS Innsbruck] obcm1.04
From: OE7FTJ @ OE7XLR.#OE7.AUT.EU (Wolf)
To: WIFI @ WW
X-Info: Sent with login password
X-Info: Received by SMTP-gateway
w0rli@w0rli.or.usa.noam wrote:
> <VK4YAR@VK4DGQ.#BNE.QLD.AUS.OC> wrote in message news:31663_VK4DGQ...
>
>>From: VK4YAR@VK4DGQ.#BNE.QLD.AUS.OC
>>To : WIFI@WW
>>
>>The Queensland Digital Group has both packet and 2.4 GHz WiFi in it's
>>network.
>>I see no reason to limit amateur radio in any way.
>>
>>Alan VK4YAR
>
>
>
> Do you run the WiFi in the ham band?
> Works quite well.
>
But whats about the bandwidth? 20MHz as a ham application ...?
de Wolf, oe7ftj
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
