| |
PE1OUD > VISTA 09.02.07 15:35l 34 Lines 1072 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : C50262PE1OUD
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Vista Versions
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0SL<DB0FSG<DB0GAP<DB0GPP<DB0LX<DB0RBS<DB0SWR<DB0MW<
DB0ZDF<DB0LJ<DB0RES<PI8DAZ<PI8HGL
Sent: 070209/1245Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:1342 [Den Haag] $:C50262PE1OUD
From: PE1OUD@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : VISTA@WW
VK2AWZ wrote:-
>
> Re XP I have found out why MS do not put MSBACKUP in XP HOME. It is
> because the backups would not be suitable to resore into XP PRO.
Why would you want to? Back-ups are made to restore to the
original situation, are they not? I DO have MSBACKUP in XP-Home.
> Apparently the Home version has a lower, non matching file system to Pro.
I use Pro and Home on two network connected machines sharing files
and programs between them: never a problem of this sort.
There IS MSBACKUP in Home! And it will even back-up the Pro Machine
over the network link.
> What it amounts to is that Home is an inferior system to Pro.
It SEEMS to me that on a similar machine Pro is a bit more
stable.
73 - Gerard, PE1OUD @ PI8HGL
E-mail : pe1oud@amsat.org
"The bad news is Iran is capable of making a nuclear bomb. The good
news is they have to drop it from a camel." - David Letterman
Message timed: 13:27 on 09 Feb 2007
Message sent using WinPack V6.80
Written by Roger Barker, Silent Key, 9th September 2
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
