| |
G0TEZ > TREK 06.03.04 04:03l 33 Lines 1104 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 420415G0TEZ
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: My apology.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<7M3TJZ<KP4IG<VK3TE<GB7YFS
Sent: 040306/0029Z @:GB7YFS.#26.GBR.EU #:41136 [Bourne] $:420415G0TEZ
From: G0TEZ@GB7YFS.#26.GBR.EU
To : TREK@WW
I think Warren has it wrong again.
I only apologiesed fpr confusing space shuttles. Challenger with Columbia.
I still think Warren should go and learn what 'ablative' means as he
clearly doesn't.
As for 'plasma'. It does have a meaning in physics, which could be used to
describe the hot gases exiting a dodgy 'O' ring on a booster.
However. I don't think it's a fuel for those space shuttles. They still
only use a Hydrocarbon/Oxidant combinations.
'Plasma conduits, especially 'Warp Plasma Conduits' are just a figment of
the late Gene Roddenberry's imagination.
Star Trek is notorious for getting it's sciences mixed up.
In this case, I think 'Warp Plasma' is just part of the 'Technobabble'
they are so fond of. A bit like those 'Deuterium' mines really,Hi!
In conclusion, Warren. Look up the meaning of 'apology'. It doesn't mean
the same thing as saying 'I'm sorry'.
Perhaps we'll get another film with the Hollywood version of 'O' rings and
'Ablative Shields, complete with superglue. A bit like 'Apollo 13' mainly
fiction.
73. Ian.
€€€€€€€€
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
