OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
GM0CSZ > TECHNI   04.06.06 22:58l 45 Lines 1713 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : E12276GM0CSZ
Read: DL1LCA GUEST
Subj: Re: Skin depth in copper
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0FHK<DB0LJ<DB0RES<ON0AR<GB7FCR<GB7SAN<GB7INV<
      GB7NOS
Sent: 060602/1149Z @:GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU #:11030 [Golspie] FBB7.00i $:E12276GM0CS
From: GM0CSZ@GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU
To  : TECHNI@WW


DF3VI wrote:-
> 
>>    Bet you thought skin depth at 50 Hz was irrelevant, I did until I
>>    did the sums.
>>    Frequency    Skin depth
>>      50 Hz       9.35 mm
> 
> That IS irrelevant. 
> Even for somewhat higher frequencies you rarely have a _massive_ > conductor
where skin depth
matters. A massive copper conductor of
> almost 20 mm diameter (300 mm^2) cannot be handled, that is why stranded
> conductors are used. Now it is the diameter of each strand that counts.
> So yes, skin effect does not start to matter until you are in the MHz, 
> or in the high power/current transmission.
> 73, Patrick
==================================
Patrick , This subject intrigues me.
If you can provide a 'skin depth versus frequency table' that would be
quite useful.
I suppose I can also find that type of info by doing 'a Google'.

Some time ago I tried to convert an italian made (valve) CB amplifier for
operation on 70 MHz , to assist a fellow radio amateur ,having received
reports that others had been successful. After reducing the number of
turns of the output PI (tank) filter I checked output impedance with an
MFJ antenna analyser 
However ,although I got a resistive 50 Ohms value on both in- and output
,the unit produced 'zilch' output power.
Upon reflection I think I should have changed the PI output filter
inductor ,by replacing  the 1.5 mm OD  wire by say 4 or 6 mm OD copper
tubing .
This because of the increased skin effect changing from 27 to 70 MHz.
Perhaps you can confirm this.
TIA

73 - Frank , GM0CSZ @ GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU
             Inver by Tain , IV20 1RX   Scotland UK     Loc: IO87AT     

Message timed: 11:43 UTC on 02 Jun 2006


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 14.03.2025 23:59:20lGo back Go up