| |
VK2ZRG > TECH 27.05.06 15:26l 44 Lines 1630 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 28578_VK2TGB
Read: DL1LCA GUEST
Subj: Re: Resistivities of metals
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0SHL<DB0SON<DB0SIF<DB0FSG<I4UKI<IQ3BV<IT9LCP<
IK6IHL<IK6PYS<SP7MGD<CE8FGC<ON0BEL<VK7AX<VK2TGB
Sent: 060527/1230Z @:VK2TGB.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC #:28578 [Valley heights] FBB7.00i
From: VK2ZRG@VK2TGB.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
To : TECH@WW
VK2ZRG/TPK 1.83d Msg #:2344 Date:27-05-06 Time:13:16Z
Paul M0CNL wrote :-
>As I explained in my SP to you those figures were not "mine" as such, they
>were taken from a website that when you asked me, I couldn't remember the
>address of and that they were only from some research that I had quickly done
>at the time. I have since gone back through my history logs and found that
>they came from:
http://www.answers.com/topic/table-of-resistivities
Hello Paul,
Paul, I only received your SP this morning, 27th May, long after my bulletin
was posted on 26th May. Yes, I do understand that the list wasn't your work,
and was taken from a reference source. Thank you for the web address.
(I've replied to your SP this morning, 27th May, Paul. Hope it travels a little
faster than your SP.)
Paul wrote later :-
>I am sure that your post is not intentionally trying to make me look stupid,
>but from the way I read it, it does. This is not intended as the start of a
>flame war or anything like it, just that I think that people should be
>presented with all the information and let them make up their own minds.
My post certainly wasn't intended to make you look stupid Paul. I apologise
if my wording gave that impression. I didn't include your list in full in my
bulletin, as your list was a recent posting. Maybe I should have, and then this
misunderstanding wouldn't have arisen. So once again, sorry if my wording wasn't
the best.
73s from Ralph VK2ZRG@VK2WI.#SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
Taglines by Colin Coker G4FCN
C Program run, C Program Crash...ReWrite in Pascal!
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
