OH6PA > ENERGY 20.06.05 19:38l 55 Lines 1649 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 5097_OH6RBT
Read: GUEST OE7FMI
Subj: Re: Global Warming ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0EA<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<DB0EEO<DB0RES<DK0WUE<SP7MGD<
IZ0AWG<KP4IG<LA2MV<GB7CIP<OH2RBI<OH1RBF<OH6RBT
Sent: 050620/1513Z @:OH6RBT.FIN.EU #:5097 [Narpes] FBB7.00d $:5097_OH6RBT
From: OH6PA@OH6RBT.FIN.EU
To : ENERGY@WW
>
>From: VK2AAB@VK2AAB.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
>To : ENERGY@WW
Helo all interested.
Who are able to explain why the weather in Scandinavia this last spring
hawe been the couldest seens year 1928
>
>A year or so ago I heard a talk by an engineer/scientist who had developed a
>theory about global warming cycles.
>
>He had written a program that took into account the variation in sunlight due
>to a number of variables.
>
>They were the precession of the elipse of the earths path around the sun.
>The precession of the poles and another factor which I can't remember.
>
>The rate at which these events occur produced a cyclic variation in the
>heating of the earth.
>The result was a seven cycle sequence.
>The first cycle is a very deep ice age followed by six minor ice ages.
>The last minor ice age was noticible in Europe about 500 years ago was
>the sixth minor cycle of the sequence and the next major ice age is hundreds
>of years in the future.
>
>However we are coming up to a maximium of temperature at the end of the
>6th minor cycle. This rise might be accelerated by CO2 possibly.
>
>He suggested that in the next few hundred years we should produce as much CO2
>as possible to enable us to keep the temperature up to survive the next
>coming major ice age.
>
>Has anyone else heard of this theory ?
>
>73 Barry VK2AAB
>
>The big advantage of standards is that there are plenty from which to choose.
>
73' Ben OH6PA
ÉÍËÍ» @ OH6RBT.FIN.EU
º ºº
º ÈÎ
º º
T4 1.4G
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| 
