VK2AAB > ENERGY 19.06.05 23:22l 34 Lines 1264 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 52237_VK2AAB
Read: GUEST OE7FMI
Subj: Global Warming ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<ZL2BAU<VK2AAB
Sent: 050619/0923Z @:VK2AAB.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC #:52237 [SYDNEY] FBB7 $:52237_VK2AAB
From: VK2AAB@VK2AAB.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
To : ENERGY@WW
A year or so ago I heard a talk by an engineer/scientist who had developed a
theory about global warming cycles.
He had written a program that took into account the variation in sunlight due
to a number of variables.
They were the precession of the elipse of the earths path around the sun.
The precession of the poles and another factor which I can't remember.
The rate at which these events occur produced a cyclic variation in the
heating of the earth.
The result was a seven cycle sequence.
The first cycle is a very deep ice age followed by six minor ice ages.
The last minor ice age was noticible in Europe about 500 years ago was
the sixth minor cycle of the sequence and the next major ice age is hundreds
of years in the future.
However we are coming up to a maximium of temperature at the end of the
6th minor cycle. This rise might be accelerated by CO2 possibly.
He suggested that in the next few hundred years we should produce as much CO2
as possible to enable us to keep the temperature up to survive the next
coming major ice age.
Has anyone else heard of this theory ?
73 Barry VK2AAB
The big advantage of standards is that there are plenty from which to choose.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| 
