| |
DF3VI > ENERGY 05.06.05 12:01l 20 Lines 947 Bytes #999 (30) @ WW
BID : 56FDB0II_01G
Read: GUEST OK1VKZ OE7FMI
Subj: Re^2: Nuclear Power, ZL1AJG
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0FHK<DB0LJ<DB0OVN<DB0II
Sent: 050605/0952z @:DB0II.#NRW.DEU.EU [BCM M'Gladbach] obcm1.06b51 LT:030
From: DF3VI @ DB0II.#NRW.DEU.EU (Patrick)
To: ENERGY @ WW
Reply-To: DF3VI @ DB0OVN.#NRW.DEU.EU
X-Info: Sent with login password
> From: ZL4AJS@ZL4GQ.#95.NZL.OC
> This makes it easier and indeed
> possible to store it safely for 10,000 years or so
Andrew,
just think back what happened the last 200 years, or even 2000 years.
Empires came and went, institutions and services were installed and they were
forgotten again; can you really believe that it will be possible to monitor
nuclear waste for 10.000 years? Only if a containment can be found that is
absolutely safe, does not need any aftercare, and makes the wast totally
inaccessible even after earth quakes and similar events, nuclear storage is
an option. Maybe it is possible to drill a deep hole/tunnel into a mountain,
store the stuff there, and afterwards blast it all up to make it inaccessible
again. The costs for such a tunnel might be some billion $ however...
73, Patrick
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
