|
ZL1AJG > ENERGY 03.06.05 11:09l 45 Lines 1766 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 461211ZL1AJG
Read: GUEST OK1VKZ OE7FMI
Subj: Re: Nuclear Power
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<DB0PV<DB0FSG<DB0SL<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<
ZL2BAU<ZL1UX
Sent: 050603/0604Z @:ZL1UX.#20.NZL.OC #:39143 [Hamilton] FBB7.00i $:461211ZL1AJ
From: ZL1AJG@ZL1UX.#20.NZL.OC
To : ENERGY@WW
> s far as waste is concerned, that is also made to sound a lot worse
> than it actually is. Compared to a coal fired power station which
> generates about 300,000 tonnes of ash per year, an equivalent Nuke
> station only generates 300 cubic metres of low level waste, and 30
> tonnes of high level waste. And there are many possiblities for storge
> of this waste. At the moment it is being stored in drums, just waiting
> for an appropriate dumping site. There has been investigation into
> dumping it deep under a mountain, and the US has decided to start
> dumping it but there is still some legal stuff to get through which
> could take years. If it is stored in a mountain, the leakage is
> approximatly 1/3 of normal background radiation. No danger whatsoever.
>
> Seventy-Three.
>
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> ::: Andrew ZL4AJS@ZL4GQ.#95.NZL.OC :::
Sure is a lo tof ash, but it is generally biodegradable, and fairly short
term, compared to the biodegradability & lifespan of Atonic waste.
The serious effects of ash fallout may be annoying, and in convenient,
but better than the other kind. Chernobyl should not have ha[ppened, but
it did, and checkout the effects of the fallout fron that, and compare ith
ash (apart from the acid rain, whisc is more the sulphite/suplphide group
comining with water to form acids. Ash is not to bad a fertiliser,; check
out how volcanic ash is in that regard.
73 Allen ZL1AJG
73 de Allen, Cambridge, N..Z. RF72RC
ZL1AJG @ ZL1UX
allengilbert@clear.net.nz
X:
Message timed: 17:56 on 03 Jun 05, using WinPack-AGW V6.80,
AMD K6-2/350, W98se, AGW-PE, Baycom modem, IC-2A, Digitor 30w amp.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |