OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
G4XNH  > TECHNI   19.08.04 11:59l 29 Lines 928 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 232591G4XNH
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Re^2: Car Battery Confusion.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0BEL<IZ0AWG<ED1ZAC<GB7YKS
Sent: 040818/2325Z @:GB7YKS.#19.GBR.EU #:12519 [Barnsley] $:232591G4XNH
From: G4XNH@GB7YKS.#19.GBR.EU
To  : TECHNI@WW


Jerry, K0CQ wrote quoting myself, :-

"It came from nowhere Andy. The engine stopped when the headlights were
switched on so nothing was required.

K0CQ 
That alternator probably was good for 50 or 60 amps. Cold head lamps that 
run on 20  amps when hot would take about 320 amps initially and  shut 
down the alternator  by  killing the field excitation. That lamp inrush 
current would have been supplied by the battery had it been connected."

I will not argue about the surge current required but I strongly suggest
to you that the alternator would suply nothing like 50 to 60 amps! In your
dreams maybe. I would be fairly surprised if even a modern car alternator
would supply that much.

73 - Jeff, G4XNH @ GB7YKS

Brightraven94@Hotmail.com

Interests. Historical research, dowsing and reading.
 
Message timed: 22:17 on 2004-Aug-18
Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 20.09.2025 21:23:19lGo back Go up