| |
VK4PKT > TECHNI 18.08.03 01:49l 38 Lines 1168 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : C60178VK4PKT
Read: DB0FHN GUEST OE7FMI
Subj: Re: Technical Ham Radio.
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0SL<DB0FSG<DB0PV<DB0MRW<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<7M3TJZ<
HA3PG<ZL2TZE<VK4TRS<VK4DGQ<VK4WIE
Sent: 030817/2328Z @:VK4WIE.#BNE.QLD.AUS.OC #:57866 [Logan City] FBB7.00g
From: VK4PKT@VK4WIE.#BNE.QLD.AUS.OC
To : TECHNI@WW
Hi All
Hartmut DL1YDD asked
"do you really think that simply using a WLAN system and putting
amateur radio contents onto it is a technical topic worth to discuss
for the amateur radio community?"
Yes Hartmut, I think it's a technical subject worth discussion over packet
radio. That's not to say that it is actually something I would DO per se
but it seems to me the kind of technical discussion Amateurs would engage
in and as to your second point..
Yes I am aware of the huge problems caused by noise from 2.4ghz systems to
Sat operations (which is why I wouldn't do it) but I doubt if all amateurs
would know yet but they will after reading Mark's bull and your reply
won't they?
Yet another reason to say "YES, this is a technical topic we SHOULD
discuss over A.R., that way people learn these things".
Just because we talk about it doesn't mean we have to go ahead and DO it.
It's a discussion was my understanding, not a plan.
Yours in Amateur Radio
Ari Laver
73 - Ari, VK4PKT @ VK4WIE-1
ax25 :- vk4pkt@vk4wie.#bne.qld.aus.oc
email :- vk4pkt@optusnet.com.au
Message timed: 08:58 on 2003-Aug-18
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
