| |
W9JUN > AMPR 17.09.19 22:00l 27 Lines 854 Bytes #-1998 (0) @ WW
BID : 28991_N9LYA
Read: GUEST DK5SG DO2TK DF7EAV
Subj: NET 44
Path: DB0FHN<OE2XZR<OE1XAB<HG8LXL<CX2SA<N3HYM<LU4ECL<CT2KCK<PY2BIL<VE2PKT<
ZL2BAU<N9PMO<N6RME<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<AA6HF<N2NOV<GB7CIP<CX2SA<OK2PEN<N1URO<
N9LYA<W9JUN
Sent: 190913/1301Z @:W9JUN.#SEIN.IN.USA.NOAM #:243 [DUPONT IN USA] $:243_W9JUN
>From w9jun%w9jun.#sein.in.usa.noam@n2nov.ampr.org Fri Sep 13 16:31:12 2019
Received: from n2nov.ampr.org by n2nov.ampr.org ([JNOS]) with SMTP
id AA773080 ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:31:12 EDT
Message-Id: <243_W9JUN@gb7cip.bbs>
>From: w9jun@w9jun.#sein.in.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (CIPOUT:GB7CIP-13 GB7CIP) -> Sending message
From: W9JUN@W9JUN.#SEIN.IN.USA.NOAM
To : AMPR@WW
Just a simple thought from a less experienced user of NET44 - Since we go to the trouble of obtaining, implementing, utilizing,
accessing, etc etc a 44.0.0.0 address, why is there very little use of it as the first option for email?. I'd rather communica
te with another amateur operator who has a net44 address using said method. How about you? Enlighten me! It's like pulling hen'
s teeth sometimes to get 'hams' to cooperate and participate.
Don, w9jun
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
