| |
ZL3AI > APRDIG 14.07.03 15:30l 43 Lines 1101 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 1608-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Jul 11, 2/2
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<ON0BEL<VK7AX<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 030713/1326Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:4286 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:1608-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To : APRDIG@WW
Subject: Re: VoIP (over packet?)
From: "Joe Della Barba" <joe@dellabarba.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:54:33 -0400
X-Message-Number: 10
Doesn't Alinco ALREADY sell digitized-voice radios?
If cell phones are anything to go by, digital=crappy sounding.
73
Joe
N3HGB-5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: VoIP (over packet?)
From: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:08:45 -0400
X-Message-Number: 11
Joe Della Barba wrote:
>Doesn't Alinco ALREADY sell digitized-voice radios?
>If cell phones are anything to go by, digital=crappy sounding.
That's only because of all of the hidden transmitters and congestion on the
network.
<grin>
Ev, W2EV
PS: I supervise a telephone system that includes some VoIP. It's fine as
long as the public IP network isn't part of the equasion. When it
is...audio quality is waterlike with plenty of dropouts.
Also...now that voice is sharing the same cable as data...you lose one due
to a transport problem...you lose both.
---
END OF DIGEST
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
