OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
ZL3AI  > APRDIG   09.06.03 11:16l 302 Lines 10397 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 1444-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Jun 03, 1/5
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0EEO<PI8DAZ<PI8HWB<ON0AR<
      7M3TJZ<WB0TAX<VK3AVE<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 030607/1328Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:1867 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:1444-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To  : APRDIG@WW

TAPR APRS Special Interest Group Digest for Tuesday, June 03, 2003.

1. Re: Air emergency?
2. Re: IP's???
3. Re: Email Line Length
4. Re: APRS Internet System Design Philosophy
5. Re: Air emergency?
6. Re: Air emergency?
7. virus attacks!
8. Re: Air emergency?
9. Re: virus attacks!
10. Re: PCSAT2 on-air and READING test.
11. Re: virus attacks!
12. Re: PCSAT2 on-air and READING test.
13. Re: virus attacks!
14. Re: virus attacks!
15. Re: APRS Internet System Design Philosophy
16. Re: virus attacks!
17. Re: Air emergency?
18. Re: Air emergency?
19. Re: Air emergency?
20. Re: Air emergency?]
21. Re: Air emergency?]
22. Re: Air emergency?]
23. Re: Air emergency?]
24. Re: Air emergency?
<LYR18439-135503-2003.06.03-13.57.07--rsnyder#toontown.erial.nj.us@lists.tapr.o>
rg
25. Re: Questions to the group
26. Re: Questions to the group
27. Re: Questions to the group
28. Re: Air emergency?]
29. Re: Questions to the group
30. and in summary
31. Re: Questions to the group
32. PCsat<=>PCSAT2 joint sat test success.
33. RE: PCsat<=>PCSAT2 joint sat test success.
34. Re: Questions to the group
35. RE: PCsat<=>PCSAT2 joint sat test success.
36. AEA PK-80 TNC
37. Re: Questions to the group
38. Re: Air emergency?]
39. RE: AEA PK-80 TNC

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Air emergency?
From: tvsjr <tvsjr@sprynet.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:12:12 -0500
X-Message-Number: 1

Comments inline...

At 06:47 PM 06/02/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>THe radio asks "Do you want to set EMergency" and then "ARE YOU SURE?"
>It seems to me that there is no easy way to do this accidentally.

It's very easy, if you have programmed the Emergency beacon into a 
programmable memory.

>> It would be helpful to establish a certain time period every so often
>> for testing of APRS Emergency beacons.
>
>NO, do it on a different frequency into a dummy load... never ever on
>144.39

How do you know that your emergency packets are being gated correctly? That 
something isn't misconfigured somewhere else (like GPS type, etc.)? There 
are many variables that you can't check if you make changes between 
configuration/testing and storage. This is why ELTs can be tested (at the 
top 5 minutes of every hour? can't remember), air raid/storm sirens are 
fully activated for testing, fire departments across the country open the 
station speakers to test their equipment, etc. You want to test the 
equipment in the exact configuration in which you plan to use it when "the 
Big One" happens, then lock it down that way... I would also advocate 
publishing a notice that you will be testing your emergency packet on-air 
on this list, but you must remember that not all APRS users are subscribed 
to the mailing list (in fact, some probably don't have Internet access at 
all and use APRS strictly via RF).

73s,
Terry/N5RSE

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: IP's???
From: "B. Hildebrand" <bhildebrand@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:24:27 -0700
X-Message-Number: 2

>Anyone know how to find   12.109.105.2    and 12.216.133.184   and tell me
>who they are?

For those using APRS+SA, there is a built in little "calculator" trick to do
a reverse DNS.  From the APRS+SA calculator, enter the follow:
#ni 'GetHostByAddr'  ip

Examples:
Enter:
#ni 'GetHostByAddr'  '12.216.133.184'
Returns

0 0 12-216-133-184.client.mchsi.com 2 4 12.216.133.184

Enter:
#ni 'GetHostByAddr'  '12.209.105.2'
Return:

0 0 12-209-105-2.client.attbi.com 2 4 12.209.105.2

A forward DNS can be done as follows:
#ni 'GetHostByName'  URL

Brent KH2Z

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Email Line Length
From: Doug McFadden <kc7imr@orednet.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Message-Number: 3

On Sat, 31 May 2003 WA8LMF2@aol.com wrote:

>>  D4        D5        D6
>>  D7        D8        D9
>>
>> Is it unreasonable to expect it to show up perfectly in other's Email?
>>
> 
>NO!  Many mail systems now use proportional-spaced fonts (different letters
>have different widths) so anything columnated with spaces is guaranteed not to
>reproduce properly on some systems.
> 
>Every time you post the satellite predictions, I have to copy the paragraph,
>paste it into a word processor and then set the font to Courier or Andale Mono
>to make it readable.

And that's easier than changing the font in the mail reader?  That's why
people seem to think they need to send e-mail in HTML.  A simple font
change would fix it.

Doug/KC7IMR

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: APRS Internet System Design Philosophy
From: Doug McFadden <kc7imr@orednet.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Message-Number: 4

On Sat, 31 May 2003, John Hansen wrote:

>Not to mention documentation.  If only we could get the folks at Microsoft
>to take a look at the JavaDocs and rewrite the Visual Studio documentation
>so that it could be read by mere mortals, it would sure make my life a lot
>easier.
>
Didn't I read somewhere that Microsoft had or was about to drop support
for Java?

Doug/KC7IMR

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Air emergency?
From: Bob Bruninga <bruninga@usna.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Message-Number: 5

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, tvsjr wrote:

>At 06:47 PM 06/02/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>THe radio asks "Do you want to set EMergency" and then "ARE YOU SURE?"
>>It seems to me that there is no easy way to do this accidentally.
>
>It's very easy, if you have programmed the Emergency beacon into a
>programmable memory.

That is not a wise thing to do.  In fact, that is quite unwise.

>>>It would be helpful to establish a certain time period every so often
>>>for testing of APRS Emergency beacons.
>>
>>NO, do it on a different frequency into a dummy load... never ever on
>>144.39
>
>How do you know that your emergency packets are being gated correctly?

Send a normal packet.  If it gets through, then so will an emergency one.
THe difference is only 1 bit.

>something isn't misconfigured somewhere else (like GPS type, etc.)? There
>are many variables that you can't check if you make changes between
>configuration/testing and storage. This is why ELTs can be tested (at the
>top 5 minutes of every hour? can't remember),

You can test your D7/D700 configuration any time 24 hours a  day.  Just
dont set the EMERGENCY flag.  ELT's only transmit emergencies, thus they
cannot be easily tested.

>station speakers to test their equipment, etc. You want to test the
>equipment in the exact configuration in which you plan to use it when "the
>Big One" happens, then lock it down that way...

It operates normally just like during an evemergency.  If it transmits
with a normal message, it will transmit with the EMERGENCY flag set.

>I would also advocate
>publishing a notice that you will be testing your emergency packet on-air
>on this list, but you must remember that not all APRS users are subscribed
>to the mailing list (in fact, some probably don't have Internet access at
>all and use APRS strictly via RF).

Testing EMREGENCY packets on 144.39 should never be done.  ever.
Not everyone will get the word and it only takes one person (out of the
10,000) that might see your message to call the cops and make a nuisance
out of the whole deal.

de WB4APR@amsat.org, Bob

PCsat WEB  page     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/pcsat.html
ISS-APRS FAQ:       http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/iss-faq.html
CUBESAT Designs     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/cubesat.html
APRS LIVE pages     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs.html
APRS SATELLITES     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/astars.html
MIM/Mic-E/Mic-Lite  http://ssdl.stanford.edu/mims/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Air emergency?
From: "The Germinos" <mgermino@inreach.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 05:37:39 -0700
X-Message-Number: 6

It was within the last year that someone on this list found someone using
the "EMERGENCY" beacon while on a search and rescue mission.  I don't
remember the details.

If the Emergency beacon is going to be viable as a call for immediate
assistance, it needs to be spelled out in BIG BLOCK LETTERS on all
documentation what the proper use of it is.  This list has the cream of the
APRS crop on it.  There are a lot of people out there that don't have a clue
about how APRS operates and they are using it.

Mike
73, AD6AA

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: virus attacks!
From: "Spider" <spider@rivcom.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 05:46:17 -0700
X-Message-Number: 7

The following IP's are sending virus out all over the internet!

12.245.206.219

12.208.100.74

12.109.105.2

12.225.139.174

Xitami experts say it's the Code Red Virus.     FYI.

It is so very important to check your machine!

Jim, WA6OFT

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Air emergency?
From: "Dakota Summerhawk" <dakotas@dotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:21:57 -0600
X-Message-Number: 8

Bob brought up some points when I was going to test my station, set it for
something like priority or special, the station shows up but dose not
trigger alarms all over the world. I have done this on my D700 or the D7 OFF
the normal aprs freq and it works just fine. I have been in ham radio for
now over ten years and public service trained as well. NEVER use emergency
unless it involves IMMEDIATE property or life threatening injuries. The
thinking that setting a beacon due to the fact that you may be involved in a
emergency drill (real or not) is no reason to set one if your or someone's
life is NOT in danger. The thinking that this is monitored all over the
WORLD gives some scope to how many listeners are really out there that may
not be transmitting but are keeping up on local and global stations. Most of
the training that I have seen has stated that equipment capable of using
this beacon (be it man down alarm, emergency beacon, etc) should be used
only when YOUR life is in danger. But then that is coming from a
firefighter/EMT training as well.
Just my thought on the matter.
Dakota

----------------------------------------------------------------------



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 13.11.2026 06:22:12lGo back Go up