OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
ZL3AI  > APRDIG   21.03.03 11:19l 58 Lines 2038 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 1046-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Mar 18, 2/2
Path: DB0FHN<DB0ZWI<DB0CHZ<DB0ERF<DB0MGB<DK0MAV<DB0UHI<DB0FC<DB0TUD<DB0GRL<
      SR6BBA<OK0PCC<OK0NAG<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<WB0TAX<N1UAN<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 030320/1036Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:62075 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:1046-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To  : APRDIG@WW

Subject: International Aprs Tracking
From: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:36:13 -0800
X-Message-Number: 12

Folks,

I am learning about APRS tracking maps, and have seen them on sites 
referenced from findu.com.
I noticed a number of ham stations apparently trekking in China, oft in 
remote areas.  In anticipation of APRS use during the Drive around the world 
expedition,
(see  http://www.drivearoundtheworld.com ) and
http://www.lgwt.com/lgcover.shtml

I hope/wonder if all those stations plotted in China have reciprocal 
licenses.  I have heard that the licensing in China is extremely tightly 
regulated.
If not, then I worry that use of APRS while unlicensed in the country used, 
can cause probems (esp to future travellers in that country) if discovered 
and not liked by the host country.
What Say?

Pat aa6eg@hotmail.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: International Aprs Tracking
From: WA8LMF2@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:21:41 EST
X-Message-Number: 13

In a message dated 3/18/2003 4:37:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
aa6eg@hotmail.com writes:

>I hope/wonder if all those stations plotted in China have reciprocal
>licenses.  I have heard that the licensing in China is extremely tightly
>regulated.

I wondeer if the stations are in China at all.  I would doubt that the APRS 
digipeater and Internet igate infrastructure exist at all there, especially 
in the remoter areas.  

I suspect the stations are elsewhere.  For example, they may have forgotton  
to use negative degrees entering their longitude in the western hemisphere 
while setting up a fixed location, or had their coords mangled by defective 
Mic-E decoding (  a common occurence -- have you ever noticed the number of 
cars in the ocean off the Azores?! ) or incorrectly set TNCs.    The only way 
I could imagine APRS posits reaching the Internet from the China interior 
would be by satellite!

---

END OF DIGEST


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 15.11.2026 12:57:46lGo back Go up