| |
ZL3AI > APRDIG 04.04.04 13:05l 166 Lines 5150 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 3090-ZL3AI
Read: GUEST
Subj: TAPR Digest, Apr 01, 1/1
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0EEO<DB0RES<
ON0AR<ZL2TZE<ZL3VML
Sent: 040404/1037Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:21952 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:3090-ZL3AI
From: ZL3AI@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To : APRDIG@WW
TAPR APRS Special Interest Group Digest for Thursday, April 01, 2004.
1. RE: Mic-E Packet Help Needed
2. RE: Mic-E Packet Help Needed
3. Status of NOSaprs project
4. Re: Status of NOSaprs project
5. SMT OpenTracker
6. RE: SMT OpenTracker
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Mic-E Packet Help Needed
From: "AE5PL Lists" <HamLists@ametx.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 06:12:43 -0600
X-Message-Number: 1
Yes, FILTER on KPC must be set to OFF. The original aprsd configuration
files for the KPC's incorrectly set this to ON causing the phenomena
that you are seeing. Off hand, I don't know about default TNC in other
IGate software.
73,
Pete Loveall AE5PL
pete@ae5pl.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Christensen, Eric
Would this be the same as "FILTER" on the Kantronics firmware? Anyone
know?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Mic-E Packet Help Needed
From: "Dick Stanich" <dick@kb7zva.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 7:36:51
X-Message-Number: 2
>Yes, FILTER on KPC must be set to OFF. The original aprsd configuration
>files for the KPC's incorrectly set this to ON causing the phenomena
>that you are seeing. Off hand, I don't know about default TNC in other
>IGate software.
>
>73,
>
>Pete Loveall AE5PL
>pete@ae5pl.net
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christensen, Eric
>Posted At: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:52 AM
>Subject: [aprssig] RE: Mic-E Packet Help Needed
>
>Would this be the same as "FILTER" on the Kantronics firmware? Anyone
>know?
Except in a case where the TNC is being operated in KISS mode. If Ui-View32
is operated in KISS mode, it's makes no difference what settings the TNC
has. It is preferred that KISS is used to avoid problems like wrong TNC
settings.
Dick, KB7ZVA
APRSWest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Status of NOSaprs project
From: "Maiko" <maiko@langelaar.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:37:12
X-Message-Number: 3
Greetings to all,
Just a quick update for those who *might* be wondering if NOSaprs is
still being maintained or developed. The answer is yes. I realize the
last update was quite some time ago, but no one has been complaining
to me about any major problems or lack of features since then, so there
hasn't been alot that needs to be done. My kids have been keeping me
busy enough <grin> ...
Lately however, I have been working on a server module that will provide
a browser based APRS Messaging center for people. This will be really cool
to play with (and yes, it will be useful). More news later on ...
Regards,
Maiko Langelaar / VE4KLM
http://www.langelaar.net
NOSaprs : http://www.qsl.net/ve4klm/packet/aprss.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Status of NOSaprs project
From: "Bill Vodall WA7NWP" <wa7nwp@jnos.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:01:05 -0800
X-Message-Number: 4
>Just a quick update for those who *might* be wondering if NOSaprs is
>still being maintained or developed. The answer is yes.
Great news!
One thought to keep in mind. Please look at separating the NOSaprs server
functions from the client functions. While I have an application right now
where I can turn on and start using NOSaprs as a server, I'm also about to
put it in the mobile on an HP palmtop. I'll probably have to hack out the
server functions there to keep memory usage to a minimum.
>Lately however, I have been working on a server module that will provide
>abrowser based APRS Messaging center for people. This will be really cool
>to play with (and yes, it will be useful). More news later on ...
Yes - that will be very cool. This will be extremely handy in an EOC
environment.
Looking forward to the update!
73,
Bill - WA7NWP
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: SMT OpenTracker
From: "Scott Miller" <scott@opentrac.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:13:02 -0800
X-Message-Number: 5
Just for the heck of it, I'm working on a surface mount version of the
OpenTracker. (Normal through-hole boards should be in stock shortly, BTW.)
The goal here is to make a really small, cheap board that can be integrated
into other stuff easily. DB9's are out because of their size, weight, and
cost.
What I want some input on is connection types. I'm leaning toward an edge
connector that you could solder SIPP-style pins on along one edge, so the
board could be mounted vertically. Minimum pin count is 8, more likely 10
or 12 to include some A/D and I/O.
This isn't something I'm planning on putting into large scale production,
but it should be a fun project for anyone with tight space or weight
requirements.
Suggestions? It's awfully quiet out there today...
Scott
N1VG
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: SMT OpenTracker
From: "Mark A. Lewis" <mark@siliconjunkie.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:34:13 -0600
X-Message-Number: 6
What about a modular connector like an rj-11 or 45. Cheap, light and
small(ish).
---
END OF DIGEST
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
