| |
N9SEO > SYSOP 27.01.25 20:33l 29 Lines 1031 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 32186_N9SEO
Read: DJ6UX GUEST
Subj: Resending: Old Bulletins
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RKB<DK0WUE<DK0WUE<VK5RSV<K7EK<VE3CGR<VA3BAL<VA3PJB<N9SEO
Sent: 250127/1834Z 32186@N9SEO.#NAR.AR.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
Original Message was sent as a P instead of bulletin. So Not sure it
reached a wider audience as intended. I am resending. See below.
Hi,
Why are we getting OLD bulletins? Do folks not reject/hold anything
older than 60 days? I thought that was the 'common' best practice on
this???? If not what is? Should not there be some limit to prevent
regurgitation of old news? Or am I missing something else here?
Example of several I got today just got to me after hoping through 4
other systems upstream before they entered my hold queue.
R:250126/2030Z 17763@VE2PKT.#TRV.QC.CAN.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
R:250126/2026Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:47600 [Salto] FBB7.00e
$:1470_KF5JRV
R:250126/1714Z 25300@N3HYM.#FRDK.MD.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
R:250126/1713Z 27457@W9GM.#SWWI.WI.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24 R:241114/1105Z
19023@KC0GIS.#NCO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 R:241114/1105Z
31922@KB5YZB.#NCO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.22 R:241114/1104Z
9273@W0ARP.#NCO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 R:241114/1104Z
1470@KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA BPQ6.0.23
73 de n9seo
Kayne
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
