| |
VE3WBZ > SP 14.04.11 15:56l 70 Lines 2220 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 25372_VA3BAL
Read: DK3UZ GUEST
Subj: RE: G0TEZ's comments
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0IUZ<DB0GOS<DB0EEO<DB0RES<DK0WUE<
IK6ZDE<VE3UIL<VE3TOK<VA3BAL
Sent: 110414/1333Z @:VA3BAL.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM #:25372 [Ballantrae] $:25372_VA3B
From: VE3WBZ@VA3BAL.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM
To : SP@WW
TO: SP @WW
FR: VE3WBZ
DT: Thursday, April 14th.,2011 @0758hrs EST
Hello Ian , and others reading along, those participating
and those, now very active behind the scenes, now experimenting...
What more can I say ?
<< Quoting G0TEZ to SP @WW >>
> From : G0TEZ To : SP @WW
> Type/Status : B$ Date/Time : 14-Apr 01:08
> Bid : CE0134G0TEZ Message # : 90881
> Title : Re: RESULTS: April 13.,2011 3:52PM
>
> Hi Pete.
>
> I have already sent an SP from GB7CIP, run by G4APL BTW.
> NR so I expect it won't be going on your UK list.
Ian, as you know, I never got the last one you sent me,
and if you sent one now, via GB7CIP ... well GB7CIP did make
the list, as I did get an SP from your BBS, as well a
PONG return from GB7CIP, so it makes the list.
Yesterday, I did chat with Paul G4APL on WCONV and he mentioned
your call ...as well I think you sending one...so this might
cause a squrrey at GB7CIP as Paul looks into why your SP
did not rewach me here...again. SO ... your SP left CIP
BUT...where did it get trashed?
> I think it is a good idea of yours to try to find out why
> we can no longer SP via packet so, best of luck and thanks
> for the updates.
>
> CUL.
>
> 73 - Ian, G0TEZ @ GB7CIP
>
> Message timed: 02:08 on 2011-Apr-14
> Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
> E-mail ihg0tez@talktalk.net
> Skype ian-g0tez
>
> [End of Message #90881 from G0TEZ]
I think this issue, was also brought up by David G4EBT ,over
some issue. Can not remember, as this issue is how I met him.
So this is a real survey as well a chance for us all sysops
and users to get to the bottom.
Another reason perhaps SPs are not getting thru, is ...mmmm
should I say so ...perhaps those not getting thru are in
some BBS reject file, and if that is the case...perhaps
they and their useless BBS should beetle off...close down
go get a life somewhere. How mnay times in the past, that
you read someone has ticked off someone somewhere and ...well
that persons call has been placed in the reject file.
Hmmmm... that is another issue... but Ian..please keep trying
73 Peter VE3WBZ
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
